Gosling S D
Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, 78712, USA.
Psychol Bull. 2001 Jan;127(1):45-86. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.127.1.45.
The author explores the viability of a comparative approach to personality research. A review of the diverse animal-personality literature suggests that (a) most research uses trait constructs, focuses on variation within (vs. across) species, and uses either behavioral codings or trait ratings; (b) ratings are generally reliable and show some validity (7 parameters that could influence reliability and 4 challenges to validation are discussed); and (c) some dimensions emerge across species, but summaries are hindered by a lack of standard descriptors. Arguments for and against cross-species comparisons are discussed, and research guidelines are suggested. Finally, a research agenda guided by evolutionary and ecological principles is proposed. It is concluded that animal studies provide unique opportunities to examine biological, genetic, and environmental bases of personality and to study personality change, personality-health links, and personality perception.
作者探讨了采用比较方法进行人格研究的可行性。对多样化的动物人格文献进行回顾后发现:(a)大多数研究使用特质结构,关注物种内部(而非跨物种)的变异,并采用行为编码或特质评分;(b)评分通常可靠且具有一定效度(讨论了可能影响可靠性的7个参数和验证面临的4个挑战);(c)某些维度在不同物种中都有出现,但由于缺乏标准描述符,难以进行总结。文中讨论了支持和反对跨物种比较的观点,并提出了研究指导方针。最后,提出了一个以进化和生态原则为指导的研究议程。结论是,动物研究为检验人格的生物学、遗传学和环境基础,以及研究人格变化、人格与健康的联系和人格认知提供了独特的机会。