Suppr超能文献

DDD起搏时,心房附件与左房游离壁起搏在左心室充盈及血流动力学方面的差异。

Differences in pacing from the atrial appendage and the lateral atrial free wall on left ventricular filling and haemodynamics during DDD pacing.

作者信息

van Campen C M, de Cock C C, Kamp O, Visser C A

机构信息

Dept of Cardiology, Academic Hospital Free University, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Europace. 2001 Jan;3(1):52-5. doi: 10.1053/eupc.2000.0134.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Atrioventricular sequential pacing involves stimulation from electrodes in the right atrium, generally the atrial appendage (RAA) and the right ventricular apex. The appendage, however, may be unsuitable if a stable position cannot be achieved. The aim of this study was to assess the haemodynamic consequences of different atrial stimulation sites during DDD pacing.

METHODS

In 12 consecutive patients (mean age 67 +/- 7 years) who underwent DDD pacemaker implantation, an additional temporary bipolar pacing electrode was positioned on the right atrial free wall. Pacing was performed alternating from the two locations at 85, 100 and 120 beats per minute (bpm). Paced atrioventricular delay was set at 180 ms. Cardiac output and mitral inflow measurements were performed using Doppler echocardiography.

RESULTS

Pacing at 85 and 100 bpm resulted in a significantly higher A-peak velocity from the RAA compared with the right atrial free wall. Cardiac index was consistently higher from the RAA location (2.4 +/- 1.2 vs 2.1 +/- 0.91. min-1 m-2 at 85 bpm, 2.71 +/- 1.4 vs 2.35 +/- 1.11. min-1 m-2 at 100 bpm and 2.94 +/- 1.5 vs 2.61 +/- 1.41. min-1 m-2 at 120 bpm, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Stimulation from the RAA was superior to stimulation from the right atrial free wall with respect to left ventricular filling and cardiac output. Compared with stimulation from the right atrial free wall, RAA pacing resulted in an increase of 10-15% in cardiac output.

摘要

引言

房室顺序起搏涉及来自右心房电极的刺激,通常是心耳(RAA)和右心室尖部。然而,如果无法获得稳定位置,心耳可能不合适。本研究的目的是评估DDD起搏期间不同心房刺激部位的血流动力学后果。

方法

在12例连续接受DDD起搏器植入的患者(平均年龄67±7岁)中,在右心房游离壁放置一根额外的临时双极起搏电极。以每分钟85、100和120次心跳(bpm)的频率在两个位置交替进行起搏。起搏房室延迟设定为180毫秒。使用多普勒超声心动图进行心输出量和二尖瓣血流测量。

结果

与右心房游离壁相比,以85和100 bpm起搏时,RAA处的A峰速度明显更高。RAA位置的心指数始终更高(85 bpm时为2.4±1.2 vs 2.1±0.9 l.min-1.m-2,100 bpm时为2.71±1.4 vs 2.35±1.1 l.min-1.m-2,120 bpm时为2.94±1.5 vs 2.61±1.4 l.min-1.m-2,P<0.05)。

结论

就左心室充盈和心输出量而言,来自RAA的刺激优于来自右心房游离壁的刺激。与来自右心房游离壁的刺激相比,RAA起搏使心输出量增加了10-15%。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验