van Campen C M, de Cock C C, Kamp O, Visser C A
Dept of Cardiology, Academic Hospital Free University, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Europace. 2001 Jan;3(1):52-5. doi: 10.1053/eupc.2000.0134.
Atrioventricular sequential pacing involves stimulation from electrodes in the right atrium, generally the atrial appendage (RAA) and the right ventricular apex. The appendage, however, may be unsuitable if a stable position cannot be achieved. The aim of this study was to assess the haemodynamic consequences of different atrial stimulation sites during DDD pacing.
In 12 consecutive patients (mean age 67 +/- 7 years) who underwent DDD pacemaker implantation, an additional temporary bipolar pacing electrode was positioned on the right atrial free wall. Pacing was performed alternating from the two locations at 85, 100 and 120 beats per minute (bpm). Paced atrioventricular delay was set at 180 ms. Cardiac output and mitral inflow measurements were performed using Doppler echocardiography.
Pacing at 85 and 100 bpm resulted in a significantly higher A-peak velocity from the RAA compared with the right atrial free wall. Cardiac index was consistently higher from the RAA location (2.4 +/- 1.2 vs 2.1 +/- 0.91. min-1 m-2 at 85 bpm, 2.71 +/- 1.4 vs 2.35 +/- 1.11. min-1 m-2 at 100 bpm and 2.94 +/- 1.5 vs 2.61 +/- 1.41. min-1 m-2 at 120 bpm, P < 0.05).
Stimulation from the RAA was superior to stimulation from the right atrial free wall with respect to left ventricular filling and cardiac output. Compared with stimulation from the right atrial free wall, RAA pacing resulted in an increase of 10-15% in cardiac output.
房室顺序起搏涉及来自右心房电极的刺激,通常是心耳(RAA)和右心室尖部。然而,如果无法获得稳定位置,心耳可能不合适。本研究的目的是评估DDD起搏期间不同心房刺激部位的血流动力学后果。
在12例连续接受DDD起搏器植入的患者(平均年龄67±7岁)中,在右心房游离壁放置一根额外的临时双极起搏电极。以每分钟85、100和120次心跳(bpm)的频率在两个位置交替进行起搏。起搏房室延迟设定为180毫秒。使用多普勒超声心动图进行心输出量和二尖瓣血流测量。
与右心房游离壁相比,以85和100 bpm起搏时,RAA处的A峰速度明显更高。RAA位置的心指数始终更高(85 bpm时为2.4±1.2 vs 2.1±0.9 l.min-1.m-2,100 bpm时为2.71±1.4 vs 2.35±1.1 l.min-1.m-2,120 bpm时为2.94±1.5 vs 2.61±1.4 l.min-1.m-2,P<0.05)。
就左心室充盈和心输出量而言,来自RAA的刺激优于来自右心房游离壁的刺激。与来自右心房游离壁的刺激相比,RAA起搏使心输出量增加了10-15%。