Carey K B, Maisto S A, Carey M P, Purnine D M
Department of Psychology, Syracuse University, New York 13244-2340, USA.
J Stud Alcohol. 2001 Jan;62(1):79-88. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2001.62.79.
The high rates of comorbid substance use disorders among persons living with severe and persistent mental illness (SPMI) have increased interest in assessing and enhancing motivation to change substance misuse in this population. This study provides evidence for the psychometric adequacy of three self-report measures of readiness-to-change.
The sample consisted of 84 persons (65% men) with co-occurring substance abuse or dependence and an SPMI. After a psychiatric assessment, participants completed three measures of readiness-to-change, which yielded seven subscales: (1) the Stages of Change Readiness and Treatment Eagerness Scale (ambivalence about change, recognition of substance-related problems, taking steps), (2) Decisional Balance Scale (pros of using, cons of using) and (3) the Alcohol and Drug Consequences Questionnaire (costs of quitting, benefits of quitting).
All of the subscales were stable over time, and 6 of the 7 subscales demonstrated excellent internal consistency. Reliability indices were comparable when analyses were repeated on subsets of participants defined by diagnosis, cognitive function, positive symptoms and negative symptoms. A pattern of theoretically meaningful intercorrelations provided convergent evidence of validity, and a general lack of relationships with demographic variables and indices of psychiatric status provided discriminant evidence of validity.
These findings support efforts to quantify readiness-to-change substance misuse among persons with an SPMI.
严重和持续性精神疾病(SPMI)患者中物质使用障碍共病率较高,这使得人们对评估和增强该人群改变物质滥用行为的动机更感兴趣。本研究为三种改变意愿的自我报告测量工具的心理测量学充分性提供了证据。
样本包括84名同时患有物质滥用或依赖和SPMI的患者(65%为男性)。经过精神科评估后,参与者完成了三种改变意愿的测量工具,产生了七个分量表:(1)改变准备和治疗渴望阶段量表(对改变的矛盾心理、对物质相关问题的认识、采取措施),(2)决策平衡量表(使用的好处、使用的坏处)和(3)酒精和药物后果问卷(戒酒的代价、戒酒的好处)。
所有分量表随时间推移都很稳定,7个分量表中有6个表现出极佳的内部一致性。当对按诊断、认知功能、阳性症状和阴性症状定义的参与者子集重复进行分析时,可靠性指标相当。理论上有意义的相互关联模式提供了效度的聚合证据,而与人口统计学变量和精神状态指标普遍缺乏关联则提供了效度的区分证据。
这些发现支持了对量化SPMI患者改变物质滥用行为意愿的努力。