Markman M
Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center, Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Oncology (Williston Park). 2001 Jan;15(1):93-8; discussion 103-5.
Phase I and II clinical trial data have demonstrated the safety, pharmacokinetic advantage, and potential for enhanced cytotoxicity associated with the intraperitoneal administration of antineoplastic agents in the management of ovarian cancer. In two randomized phase III studies comparing the intraperitoneal and intravenous administration of cisplatin (Platinol) as initial therapy for small-volume residual advanced ovarian cancer, intraperitoneal delivery of the agent produced superior progression-free and overall survival. Reluctance to employ intraperitoneal cisplatin in the standard management of ovarian cancer appears to be related to the added time, effort, and potential morbidity associated with the approach, as well as a general preference for the less toxic, less complicated carboplatin (Paraplatin)-based regimen. However, existing data support the use of this unique method of drug delivery in carefully selected patients outside of the clinical trial setting.
I期和II期临床试验数据已证明,在卵巢癌治疗中,腹腔内给予抗肿瘤药物具有安全性、药代动力学优势以及增强细胞毒性的潜力。在两项随机III期研究中,比较了顺铂(铂尔定)腹腔内给药与静脉内给药作为小体积残留晚期卵巢癌初始治疗的效果,结果显示腹腔内给药可产生更好的无进展生存期和总生存期。在卵巢癌的标准治疗中,不愿采用腹腔内顺铂似乎与该方法所需的额外时间、精力以及潜在的发病率有关,同时也普遍倾向于使用毒性较小、较简单的基于卡铂(顺铂)的治疗方案。然而,现有数据支持在精心挑选的非临床试验环境患者中使用这种独特的给药方法。