• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

氟哌啶醇和苯丙胺的日程依赖性效应:多日程任务显示受试者内效应。

Schedule-dependent effects of haloperidol and amphetamine: multiple-schedule task shows within-subject effects.

作者信息

Caul W F, Brindle N A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Wilson Hall, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240, USA.

出版信息

Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2001 Jan;68(1):53-63. doi: 10.1016/s0091-3057(00)00431-7.

DOI:10.1016/s0091-3057(00)00431-7
PMID:11274708
Abstract

A two-lever, multiple-schedule task was used to evaluate the effects of haloperidol (HA) and amphetamine (AM) on responding controlled by continuous reinforcement (CRF) and progressive ratio (PR) schedules of reinforcement. Rats were trained to press one lever for food delivered on a CRF schedule and the other lever for food delivered on a PR schedule. The operative schedule was signaled by the illumination of a cuelight mounted above the appropriate lever. Following 30 sessions of training, dose-response functions were determined for HA (0.0075, 0.015, 0.03, and 0.06 mg/kg) and AM (0.0625, 0.125, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, and 1.00 mg/kg). Both drugs produced dose- and schedule-dependent effects. For example, administration of 0.03 mg/kg HA did not affect responding under the CRF schedule but did reduce responding during PR components, whereas administration of 0.06 mg/kg reduced responding under both schedules of reinforcement. Some doses of AM produced increased responding under the CRF schedule and, within the same session, decreased responding under the PR schedule. The results with HA are consistent with the view that interfering with dopaminergic function affects the allocation and maintenance of responding and that this effect depends on properties of the schedule of reinforcement. The results with AM emphasize that statements about the effects of the drug on positively reinforced behavior cannot be made without reference to specific schedules of reinforcement.

摘要

采用双杠杆多重强化程序任务来评估氟哌啶醇(HA)和苯丙胺(AM)对由连续强化(CRF)和渐进比率(PR)强化程序所控制反应的影响。大鼠经过训练,按压一个杠杆以获取按CRF程序投递的食物,按压另一个杠杆以获取按PR程序投递的食物。操作程序通过安装在相应杠杆上方的提示灯亮起作为信号。经过30次训练后,确定了HA(0.0075、0.015、0.03和0.06毫克/千克)和AM(0.0625、0.125、0.25、0.50、0.75和1.00毫克/千克)的剂量反应函数。两种药物均产生了剂量和程序依赖性效应。例如,给予0.03毫克/千克的HA对CRF程序下的反应没有影响,但确实减少了PR部分的反应,而给予0.06毫克/千克则减少了两种强化程序下的反应。一些剂量的AM在CRF程序下使反应增加,并且在同一实验过程中,在PR程序下使反应减少。HA的结果与以下观点一致,即干扰多巴胺能功能会影响反应的分配和维持,并且这种效应取决于强化程序的特性。AM的结果强调,在不参考特定强化程序的情况下,无法对药物对阳性强化行为的影响做出陈述。

相似文献

1
Schedule-dependent effects of haloperidol and amphetamine: multiple-schedule task shows within-subject effects.氟哌啶醇和苯丙胺的日程依赖性效应:多日程任务显示受试者内效应。
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2001 Jan;68(1):53-63. doi: 10.1016/s0091-3057(00)00431-7.
2
Rebound responding following a single dose of drug using an amphetamine-vehicle-haloperidol drug discrimination.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1996 Dec;128(3):274-9. doi: 10.1007/s002130050135.
3
Comparison of the effects of clozapine, haloperidol, chlorpromazine and d-amphetamine on performance on a time-constrained progressive ratio schedule and on locomotor behaviour in the rat.氯氮平、氟哌啶醇、氯丙嗪和右旋苯丙胺对大鼠限时渐进比率程序表现及运动行为影响的比较。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2000 Sep;152(1):47-54. doi: 10.1007/s002130000486.
4
The effects of psychotomimetics and psychomotor stimulants on two schedules promoting response switching in the rat.拟精神病药物和精神运动兴奋剂对大鼠两种促进反应转换的程序的影响。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2002 Oct;163(3-4):381-90. doi: 10.1007/s00213-002-1184-1. Epub 2002 Aug 29.
5
Effects of aripiprazole on operant responding for a natural reward after psychostimulant withdrawal in rats.阿立哌唑对大鼠精神兴奋剂戒断后自然奖赏操作性反应的影响。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2007 Apr;191(3):759-65. doi: 10.1007/s00213-006-0520-2. Epub 2006 Sep 5.
6
Environmental enrichment decreases intravenous amphetamine self-administration in rats: dose-response functions for fixed- and progressive-ratio schedules.环境富集减少大鼠静脉注射苯丙胺的自我给药行为:固定比率和累进比率程序的剂量反应函数
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2002 Aug;162(4):373-8. doi: 10.1007/s00213-002-1134-y. Epub 2002 Jun 7.
7
The effects of D-amphetamine on responding for candy and fruit drink using a fixed ratio and a progressive ratio schedule of reinforcer delivery.使用固定比率和渐进比率强化物递送时间表时,右旋苯丙胺对糖果和果汁饮料反应的影响。
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2001 May-Jun;69(1-2):125-31. doi: 10.1016/s0091-3057(01)00496-8.
8
Characterizing withdrawal in rats following repeated drug administration using an amphetamine-vehicle-haloperidol drug discrimination.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1999 Apr;143(3):219-26. doi: 10.1007/s002130050940.
9
Attenuation of the amphetamine discriminative cue in rats with the atypical antipsychotic olanzapine.非典型抗精神病药物奥氮平对大鼠苯丙胺辨别性线索的减弱作用。
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2002 Jul;72(4):767-77. doi: 10.1016/s0091-3057(02)00766-9.
10
Effects of environmental enrichment on extinction and reinstatement of amphetamine self-administration and sucrose-maintained responding.环境丰富化对苯丙胺自我给药及蔗糖维持反应消退和恢复的影响。
Behav Pharmacol. 2006 Nov;17(7):597-604. doi: 10.1097/01.fbp.0000236271.72300.0e.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of a non-food or water motivated effort-based foraging task as a measure of motivational state in male mice.验证一种非食物或水动机的基于努力的觅食任务作为测量雄性小鼠动机状态的指标。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2024 Nov;49(12):1883-1891. doi: 10.1038/s41386-024-01899-y. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
2
Increased elasticity of sucrose demand during hyperdopaminergic states in rats.在大鼠的高多巴胺能状态下,蔗糖需求的弹性增加。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2022 Mar;239(3):773-794. doi: 10.1007/s00213-022-06068-x. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
3
Effort-based decision making varies by smoking status.
基于努力的决策因吸烟状况而异。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2020 Apr;237(4):1081-1090. doi: 10.1007/s00213-019-05437-3. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
4
Methylphenidate increases willingness to perform effort in adults with ADHD.哌醋甲酯可提高 ADHD 成人的努力意愿。
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2019 Aug;183:14-21. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2019.06.008. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
5
Emerging roles of striatal dopamine D2 receptors in motivated behaviour: Implications for psychiatric disorders.纹状体多巴胺 D2 受体在动机行为中的新作用:对精神疾病的影响。
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2020 Jun;126 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):47-55. doi: 10.1111/bcpt.13271. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
6
The Psychopharmacology of Effort-Related Decision Making: Dopamine, Adenosine, and Insights into the Neurochemistry of Motivation.努力相关决策的精神药理学:多巴胺、腺苷及对动机神经化学的深入了解。
Pharmacol Rev. 2018 Oct;70(4):747-762. doi: 10.1124/pr.117.015107.
7
Striatal GPR88 Modulates Foraging Efficiency.纹状体GPR88调节觅食效率。
J Neurosci. 2017 Aug 16;37(33):7939-7947. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2439-16.2017. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
8
Neural substrates underlying effort, time, and risk-based decision making in motivated behavior.动机行为中基于努力、时间和风险的决策背后的神经基质。
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2016 Sep;133:233-256. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2016.07.015. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
9
Activational and effort-related aspects of motivation: neural mechanisms and implications for psychopathology.动机的激活与努力相关方面:神经机制及其对精神病理学的影响。
Brain. 2016 May;139(Pt 5):1325-47. doi: 10.1093/brain/aww050.
10
The behavioral pharmacology of effort-related choice behavior: dopamine, adenosine and beyond.努力相关选择行为的行为药理学:多巴胺、腺苷及其他。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2012 Jan;97(1):125-46. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2012.97-125.