• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Maternal serum screening, political decision-making and social learning.

作者信息

Stemerding D, van Berkel D

机构信息

University of Twente, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Health Policy. 2001 May;56(2):111-25. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(00)00139-1.

DOI:10.1016/s0168-8510(00)00139-1
PMID:11275301
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Analysis and evaluation of the process by which serum screening has been introduced in Dutch maternity care. In our analysis of Dutch medical journals, reports of the government and the political and cultural debate, we use a theoretical framework in which the process of introduction of new technologies is described in terms of different social learning processes.

RESULTS

The analysis shows a dual-track pattern: promotion by the medical community, and control and regulation of serum screening by the political decision-makers. This process left little room for social learning processes. This applied in particular to learning processes about the social and cultural meaning and acceptability of serum screening. Acceptability of the new serum screening was framed nearly exclusively in terms of freedom of choice.

CONCLUSIONS

A too limited framework of assessment was used. Health technology assessment (HTA) should incorporate in the evaluation process the ethical, social, cultural and political dimensions of health technology, and stimulate the interplay between different perspectives and preferences among parties involved. As a new promising approach, we suggest the use of pilot experiments that are designed as social experiments involving different parties in a common learning process.

摘要

相似文献

1
Maternal serum screening, political decision-making and social learning.
Health Policy. 2001 May;56(2):111-25. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(00)00139-1.
2
Screening for fetal abnormalities: from a health technology assessment report to a national statute.胎儿异常筛查:从一份卫生技术评估报告到一部国家法规。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2007 Fall;23(4):436-42. doi: 10.1017/S0266462307070663.
3
Improving population health or the population itself? Health technology assessment and our genetic future.改善人群健康还是人群本身?卫生技术评估与我们的基因未来。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004 Spring;20(2):106-14. doi: 10.1017/s0266462304000893.
4
Prenatal diagnosis, prenatal screening, and the rise of the tentative pregnancy.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1991;7(4):509-16. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300007078.
5
Technology assessment and the sociopolitics of health technologies.技术评估与卫生技术的社会政治
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2000 Dec;25(6):1083-120. doi: 10.1215/03616878-25-6-1083.
6
Technology assessment, priority setting, and appropriate care in Dutch health care.荷兰医疗保健中的技术评估、优先级设定与适当护理。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004 Winter;20(1):35-43. doi: 10.1017/s0266462304000765.
7
Health technology assessment and screening in The Netherlands: case studies of mammography in breast cancer, PSA screening in prostate cancer, and ultrasound in normal pregnancy.荷兰的卫生技术评估与筛查:乳腺癌钼靶检查、前列腺癌PSA筛查及正常妊娠超声检查的案例研究
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2001 Summer;17(3):369-79. doi: 10.1017/s0266462301106082.
8
Utilisation of medical technology assessment in health policy.
Health Policy. 1997 Dec;42(3):211-22. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(97)00073-0.
9
Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.避免和识别健康技术评估模型中的错误:定性研究和方法学综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 May;14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. doi: 10.3310/hta14250.
10
Health technology assessment in four countries: response from political science.四个国家的卫生技术评估:政治学的回应
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004 Winter;20(1):55-60. doi: 10.1017/s0266462304000789.

引用本文的文献

1
Genetic screening and democracy: lessons from debating genetic screening criteria in the Netherlands.基因筛查与民主:荷兰基因筛查标准辩论的启示
J Community Genet. 2012 Apr;3(2):79-89. doi: 10.1007/s12687-011-0063-z. Epub 2011 Aug 30.
2
Genetic testing and common disorders in a public health framework: how to assess relevance and possibilities. Background Document to the ESHG recommendations on genetic testing and common disorders.公共卫生框架下的基因检测与常见疾病:如何评估相关性及可能性。欧洲人类遗传学学会关于基因检测与常见疾病建议的背景文件
Eur J Hum Genet. 2011 Apr;19 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S6-44. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2010.249.