• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于结果测量与管理的临床决策支持系统。

Clinical decision support systems for outcome measurement and management.

作者信息

Sakallaris B R, Jastremski C A, Von Rueden K T

机构信息

APACHE Medical Systems, Suite 300, 1650 Tysons Blvd., McLean, VA 22102-3915, USA.

出版信息

AACN Clin Issues. 2000 Aug;11(3):351-62. doi: 10.1097/00044067-200008000-00003.

DOI:10.1097/00044067-200008000-00003
PMID:11276650
Abstract

Clinical decision support systems are the foundation for outcome management programs through the measurement of specific outcomes, data storage, data analysis, predictive modeling, and risk-adjusted comparison of actual outcomes with predicted outcomes. Many clinical decision support tools or databases are available to clinicians. This article reviews two widely available tools that provide clinical decision support for critical care clinicians, the Project IMPACT and APACHE III Critical Care Series clinical decision support systems. These tools are discussed with regard to risk adjustment methodology, validity, reliability, database size and representation, retrospective and prospective data and analysis, and quality control. Clinical application of clinical decision support systems for benchmarking and use in process improvement and outcome management is reviewed.

摘要

临床决策支持系统是通过特定结果的测量、数据存储、数据分析、预测建模以及实际结果与预测结果的风险调整比较来实现结果管理计划的基础。临床医生可以使用许多临床决策支持工具或数据库。本文回顾了两种广泛使用的为重症监护临床医生提供临床决策支持的工具,即“影响项目”(Project IMPACT)和“急性生理学及慢性健康状况评价系统Ⅲ(APACHE III)重症监护系列”临床决策支持系统。将从风险调整方法、有效性、可靠性、数据库规模和代表性、回顾性和前瞻性数据及分析以及质量控制等方面对这些工具进行讨论。还将回顾临床决策支持系统在基准比较以及过程改进和结果管理中的临床应用。

相似文献

1
Clinical decision support systems for outcome measurement and management.用于结果测量与管理的临床决策支持系统。
AACN Clin Issues. 2000 Aug;11(3):351-62. doi: 10.1097/00044067-200008000-00003.
2
The case against using the APACHE system to predict intensive care unit outcome in trauma patients.反对使用急性生理学及慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE)预测创伤患者重症监护病房治疗结果的理由。
Crit Care Clin. 1994 Jan;10(1):117-26; discussion 127-34.
3
A qualitative analysis of how advanced practice nurses use clinical decision support systems.对高级执业护士如何使用临床决策支持系统的定性分析。
J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2007 Dec;19(12):652-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2007.00266.x.
4
Web-based outcomes measurement tools complement managed-care decision making and improve patient care.基于网络的结果测量工具辅助管理式医疗决策制定并改善患者护理。
ONS News. 1999 Feb;14(2):8.
5
Risk-adjusted outcome models for public mental health outpatient programs.公共心理健康门诊项目的风险调整后结果模型。
Health Serv Res. 1999 Apr;34(1 Pt 1):171-95.
6
A basic and practical overview of the six steps of outcome-based quality improvement. Selecting target outcomes: the basics.基于结果的质量改进六个步骤的基础与实践概述。选择目标结果:基础内容。
Home Healthc Nurse. 2002 Aug;20(8):525-8. doi: 10.1097/00004045-200208000-00013.
7
Prognostic models based on administrative data alone inadequately predict the survival outcomes for critically ill patients at 180 days post-hospital discharge.仅基于行政数据的预后模型不能充分预测出院后 180 天危重症患者的生存结果。
J Crit Care. 2012 Aug;27(4):422.e11-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2012.03.008. Epub 2012 May 15.
8
A basic and practical overview of the six steps of outcome-based quality improvement. Interpreting outcome reports: the basics.基于结果的质量改进六个步骤的基础与实践概述。解读结果报告:基础内容。
Home Healthc Nurse. 2002 Aug;20(8):517-22. doi: 10.1097/00004045-200208000-00011.
9
Right patient? Right bed? A question of appropriateness.患者正确?床位正确?一个适宜性的问题。
AACN Clin Issues. 2000 Aug;11(3):375-85. doi: 10.1097/00044067-200008000-00005.
10
Prediction of outcome from intensive care: a prospective cohort study comparing Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II and III prognostic systems in a United Kingdom intensive care unit.重症监护结局的预测:一项前瞻性队列研究,比较英国一家重症监护病房中急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估II和III预后系统。
Crit Care Med. 1997 Jan;25(1):9-15. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199701000-00006.

引用本文的文献

1
Interpretations of the Role of Plasma Albumin in Prognostic Indices: A Literature Review.血浆白蛋白在预后指标中的作用解读:文献综述
J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 22;12(19):6132. doi: 10.3390/jcm12196132.
2
Developing theory-informed knowledge translation strategies to facilitate the use of patient-reported outcome measures in interdisciplinary low back pain clinical practices in Quebec: mixed methods study.制定理论导向的知识转化策略,以促进在魁北克的跨学科腰痛临床实践中使用患者报告的结局测量:混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Aug 25;20(1):789. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05616-5.
3
Application Values of Six Scoring Systems in the Prognosis of Stroke Patients.
六种评分系统在脑卒中患者预后中的应用价值
Front Neurol. 2020 Jan 30;10:1416. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.01416. eCollection 2019.
4
A methodological approach to identify external factors for indicator-based risk adjustment illustrated by a cataract surgery register.一种通过白内障手术登记册举例说明的、用于识别基于指标的风险调整外部因素的方法学途径。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Jun 25;14:279. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-279.
5
[Potentials and limitations of the planned compulsory quality assurance program for cataract surgery (Qesü)].[白内障手术计划中的强制性质量保证计划(Qesü)的潜力与局限]
Ophthalmologe. 2013 Apr;110(4):370-6. doi: 10.1007/s00347-013-2811-4.