Kawahara J, Miyatani M
Department of Psychology, Hiroshima University, Japan.
J Gen Psychol. 2001 Jan;128(1):57-75. doi: 10.1080/00221300109598898.
In the present study, the authors observed the effect of informative and uninformative attentional cueing on visual search for targets that were defined by a simple feature or by conjunctions of features. Three different types of attentional cueing were tested in three experiments: peripheral informative cueing, peripheral uninformative cueing, and central informative cueing. Participants showed a greater effect of cueing in detecting a conjunction of features than in detecting unique features only when attention was oriented by either peripheral or central informative cueing. This differential cueing effect was not observed when attention was oriented by peripheral uninformative cueing. The results suggest that voluntarily oriented attention plays a more important role in feature integration than automatically oriented attention does. The results also pose limits on the generalizability of K. A. Briand's (1998) proposal regarding the role of automatically oriented attention in feature integration.
在本研究中,作者观察了信息性和非信息性注意提示对视觉搜索由简单特征或特征组合定义的目标的影响。在三个实验中测试了三种不同类型的注意提示:外周信息性提示、外周非信息性提示和中央信息性提示。只有当注意通过外周或中央信息性提示定向时,参与者在检测特征组合时比仅检测独特特征时表现出更大的提示效应。当注意通过外周非信息性提示定向时,未观察到这种差异提示效应。结果表明,自愿定向的注意在特征整合中比自动定向的注意发挥更重要的作用。这些结果也对K. A. 布莱恩德(1998年)关于自动定向注意在特征整合中的作用的提议的普遍性提出了限制。