• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

引出患者对心肺复苏不良后果的效用缺失情况。

Eliciting patient disutilities for the adverse outcomes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

作者信息

Sorum P C, Muñoz Sastre M T, Mullet E, Gamelin A

机构信息

Departments of Medicine and Pediatrics, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, USA.

出版信息

Resuscitation. 2001 Mar;48(3):265-73. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(00)00260-4.

DOI:10.1016/s0300-9572(00)00260-4
PMID:11278092
Abstract

BACKGROUND

in helping patients decide about treatments, such as whether to authorize cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), physicians typically present information about the possible outcomes and their likelihoods. The aim of this study was to elicit patient disutilities for the adverse outcomes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) using the methodology of NH Anderson's functional theory of cognition and to determine how patients integrate the disutility and the likelihood of an outcome.

METHODS

77 French adults rated scenarios of possible outcomes of CPR on a linear scale with anchors "what would be the best (or worst) for me." In 25 of the 27 scenarios, the result would be either total recovery or one of five adverse outcomes (chest injury, mild reversible brain damage, severe irreversible brain damage, death after intensive care, immediate death) with one of five likelihoods (one to five chances out of ten). In the other two, the only possible result was either total recovery or immediate death.

RESULTS

the mean disutilities relative to 0 for chest injury and 100 for severe brain damage were 13 for mild brain injury, 68 for death after intensive care, and 69 for immediate death. The graphs of the ratings of each adverse outcome in relation to its frequency were fan-shaped, showing that participants integrated this information multiplicatively.

CONCLUSIONS

the functional theory of cognition provides an alternate method of eliciting patient utilities for the outcomes of CPR and supports clinicians' assumption that people combine utility and likelihood multiplicatively.

摘要

背景

在帮助患者决定治疗方案,比如是否授权进行心肺复苏(CPR)时,医生通常会提供有关可能结果及其可能性的信息。本研究的目的是使用NH·安德森的认知功能理论方法,得出患者对心肺复苏(CPR)不良后果的负效用,并确定患者如何综合负效用和结果的可能性。

方法

77名法国成年人用“对我来说最好(或最坏)的情况”作为锚点,在线性量表上对心肺复苏可能的结果进行评分。在27个场景中的25个中,结果要么是完全康复,要么是五个不良后果之一(胸部受伤、轻度可逆性脑损伤、重度不可逆性脑损伤、重症监护后死亡、立即死亡),可能性为五分之一(十分之一次到五次)。在另外两个场景中,唯一可能的结果要么是完全康复,要么是立即死亡。

结果

相对于胸部受伤为0、重度脑损伤为100,轻度脑损伤的平均负效用为13,重症监护后死亡为68,立即死亡为69。每个不良后果的评分与其发生频率的关系图呈扇形,表明参与者以乘法方式综合了这些信息。

结论

认知功能理论提供了一种得出患者对心肺复苏结果的效用的替代方法,并支持临床医生的假设,即人们以乘法方式综合效用和可能性。

相似文献

1
Eliciting patient disutilities for the adverse outcomes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.引出患者对心肺复苏不良后果的效用缺失情况。
Resuscitation. 2001 Mar;48(3):265-73. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(00)00260-4.
2
Eliciting utilities using functional methodology: people's disutilities for the adverse outcomes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.使用功能方法引出效用:人们对心肺复苏不良后果的负效用
Qual Life Res. 2006 Apr;15(3):429-39. doi: 10.1007/s11136-005-2830-y.
3
Deciding about cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The contributions of decision analysis.
Arch Intern Med. 1995 Mar 13;155(5):513-21.
4
The Association between Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Out-of-Hospital Settings and Chest Injuries: A Retrospective Observational Study.院外环境下心肺复苏与胸部损伤之间的关联:一项回顾性观察研究。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018 Apr;33(2):171-175. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X18000201. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
5
Living wills and resuscitation preferences in an elderly population.老年人群的生前预嘱与复苏意愿
Arch Intern Med. 1995 Jan 23;155(2):171-5.
6
7
2017 American Heart Association Focused Update on Pediatric Basic Life Support and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality: An Update to the American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.2017 年美国心脏协会儿童基础生命支持和心肺复苏质量重点更新:对美国心脏协会心肺复苏和紧急心血管护理指南的更新。
Circulation. 2018 Jan 2;137(1):e1-e6. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000540. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
8
Choices of seriously ill patients about cardiopulmonary resuscitation: correlates and outcomes. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments.重症患者对心肺复苏的选择:相关因素及结果。支持研究组。了解治疗预后及风险的预后和偏好研究。
Am J Med. 1996 Feb;100(2):128-37. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(97)89450-8.
9
Factors associated with use of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in seriously ill hospitalized adults.成年住院重症患者心肺复苏使用的相关因素
JAMA. 1999;282(24):2333-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.24.2333.
10
Saving life and brain with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A single-center analysis of in-hospital cardiac arrests.体外心肺复苏术拯救生命和大脑:院内心搏骤停的单中心分析。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Nov;150(5):1344-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.07.061. Epub 2015 Jul 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Eliciting utilities using functional methodology: people's disutilities for the adverse outcomes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.使用功能方法引出效用:人们对心肺复苏不良后果的负效用
Qual Life Res. 2006 Apr;15(3):429-39. doi: 10.1007/s11136-005-2830-y.
2
When is physician assisted suicide or euthanasia acceptable?医生协助自杀或安乐死在何时是可以接受的?
J Med Ethics. 2003 Dec;29(6):330-6. doi: 10.1136/jme.29.6.330.