Socrate A M, Rosati L, Locati P
Department of Vascular Surgery, Busto Arsizio Hospital, Varese, Italy.
Minerva Cardioangiol. 2001 Feb;49(1):37-45.
Our series of secondary aorto prosthetic fistulas (PEF) to identify if and how different surgical treatment affect outcome is reviewed.
Between 1982 and December 1999, in the authors department, 42 patients were investigated for a secondary PEF. Mean age was 65 years: the mean time interval since the primitive aortic procedure was 49 months. Twenty patients were treated in emergency surgery: 29 presented evidence of gastrointestinal bleeding. The preoperative work-up included esophagogastroduodenoscopy, CT scan, and aortography. The vast majority of PEF were in a duodenal location. Surgical procedure carried out was graft excision, bowel suture or bowel resection, aortic stump closure and axillofemoral (AXF) bypass (11), new in situ revascularization by synthetic prosthesis (5), simple suture (9), graft excision without revascularization (1), in situ revascularization using arterial homograft (13).
The mean surgery duration was 4 hours and 53 minutes, the mean blood loss was 1845+/-1132. Two patients died shortly after proximal aortic control was obtained. Early overall mortality was 50%, the early overall bypass occlusion rate was 12.5%, the early overall amputation rate was 10%, and the early new PEF rate was 12.5%. Late overall mortality was 22.5%, the late overall bypass occlusion rate was 20%, the late overall amputation rate was 7.5%, and the late new PEF rate was 10%.
Bleeding of the gastrointestinal tract in patients with a history of intra-abdominal reconstructive vascular surgery must raise severe suspicion as to the certainty of existence of a PEF unless the diagnostic procedure excludes this possibility. All treatment methods resulted in catastrophic failure, related to recurrent PEF or septic complication. Perhaps, in the presence of PEF extra-anatomical bypass associated with aortic ligature remains an interesting surgical solution.
回顾我们一系列继发性主动脉人工血管瘘(PEF)病例,以确定不同的手术治疗方法是否以及如何影响治疗结果。
1982年至1999年12月期间,作者所在科室对42例继发性PEF患者进行了研究。平均年龄为65岁,自初次主动脉手术后的平均时间间隔为49个月。20例患者接受了急诊手术,29例有胃肠道出血证据。术前检查包括食管胃十二指肠镜检查、CT扫描和主动脉造影。绝大多数PEF位于十二指肠部位。实施的手术包括人工血管切除、肠缝合或肠切除、主动脉残端闭合及腋股(AXF)旁路移植术(11例)、使用合成人工血管进行新的原位血管重建(5例)、单纯缝合(9例)、未进行血管重建的人工血管切除(1例)、使用动脉同种异体移植物进行原位血管重建(13例)。
平均手术时间为4小时53分钟,平均失血量为1845±1132。2例患者在获得近端主动脉控制后不久死亡。早期总死亡率为50%,早期总旁路移植闭塞率为12.5%,早期总截肢率为10%,早期新PEF发生率为12.5%。晚期总死亡率为22.5%,晚期总旁路移植闭塞率为20%,晚期总截肢率为7.5%,晚期新PEF发生率为10%。
有腹腔内重建血管手术史的患者出现胃肠道出血时,除非诊断程序排除这种可能性,否则必须高度怀疑是否存在PEF。所有治疗方法均导致灾难性失败,与复发性PEF或感染性并发症有关。或许,在存在PEF的情况下,与主动脉结扎相关的解剖外旁路移植仍是一种值得关注的手术解决方案。