Suppr超能文献

可切除胸段食管癌的术前化疗

Preoperative chemotherapy for resectable thoracic esophageal cancer.

作者信息

Malthaner R, Fenlon D

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Western Ontario, London Health Sciences Centre, 375 South Street, Suite N345, London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 4G5.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001(1):CD001556. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001556.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Carcinoma of the esophagus is a relatively uncommon but lethal cancer that continues to kill over 90% of its victims within 5 years. Surgery is the treatment of choice for most localized esophageal cancer patients. However, despite curative resection, the 5-year survival rate ranges from 15% to 39%. The failure of surgery to cure clinically localized esophageal cancer is because of the advanced state of the disease before symptoms occur, high frequency of lymph node involvement, and the common occurrence of submucosal spread and extension to surrounding structures. Preoperative chemotherapy has been used in an attempt to decrease tumour activity, increase resectability, and improve disease-free and overall survival. A number of studies have investigated whether preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgery leads to an improvement in cure rates, but the individual reports have not been encouraging. The role of preoperative chemotherapy in the treatment of resectable thoracic esophageal cancer remains undefined.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review is to determine the role of preoperative chemotherapy on overall survival and/or quality-of-life for patients with resectable thoracic esophageal carcinoma.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Trials were identified by searching the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (Issue 2 - 2000), MEDLINE (1966 - 2000), EMBASE (1988 - 2000) and CancerLit (1993 - 2000). The references of all identified studies, review articles, and standard textbooks were examined. Members of the Cochrane UGPD Group and experts in the oncology field were contacted and asked to supply details of any outstanding clinical trials and relevant unpublished materials. There were no language restrictions. The searches were updated in June 2000. The clinical trial registers of the National Cancer Institute and the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group were consulted for ongoing trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Types of studies Studies (published or unpublished) that randomised patients with potentially resectable carcinoma of the esophagus (of any histologic type) to chemotherapy or no chemotherapy before surgery were included in this review. Studies were excluded if they were not truly randomised (phase I or II trials), earlier versions of updated trials, if other treatment modalities (e.g. radiotherapy, hyperthermia) were used, or if there was not a surgery alone control arm. Types of participants The participants consisted of patients with potentially resectable thoracic esophageal carcinoma (of any histologic type). Trials involving patients with carcinoma of the cervical esophagus were excluded. Types of interventions Trials that compared chemotherapy before surgery (esophagectomy) with surgical resection alone (esophagectomy). Types of outcome measures The primary outcome was death at yearly intervals. Morbidity (complications), and quality-of-life were secondary outcomes.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Overall mortality at yearly intervals was determined by extracting the total number of patients randomised to the treatment and control groups and the number of deaths in each group. All analyses were carried out on intention-to-treat that is patients were analyzed according to their allocated treatment, irrespective of whether they received that treatment. Mortality at 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years were used as endpoints of clinical relevance. If survival numbers at the specified time intervals were not given, they were estimated from the published survival curves. The number of deaths in the treatment groups (preoperative chemotherapy plus surgery) was compared to the number of deaths in the control groups (surgery alone). Treatment modalities as well as patient demographics and characteristics and side-effects were also recorded. Trials meeting the inclusion criteria were evaluated by two independent reviewers using the Jadad method

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 14 randomised controlled trials and 1 meta-analysis of preoperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for esophageal carcinoma were identified to be potentially eligible for review. This review is based on 7 randomised trials and 1653 patients. At 1 year the Peto odds ratio based on the fixed-effects models showed no difference in mortality between preoperative chemotherapy and surgery alone (OR = 1.03). At 2 years there was a 20% significant decrease in mortality for preoperative chemotherapy (OR = 0.80; 95% C.I. 0.65 to 0.99) but the results were not robust. The results at 3, 4, and 5 years found odds ratios tending to favour preoperative chemotherapy, but wide confidence intervals that included 1. None of the published trials reported on quality-of-life outcomes. There appeared to be an increased risk of morbidity with chemotherapy.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: The results of this review suggest that there is no strong evidence to recommend preoperative chemotherapy in the treatment of surgically resectable carcinomas of the thoracic esophagus. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

摘要

背景

食管癌是一种相对罕见但致命的癌症,超过90%的患者会在5年内死亡。手术是大多数局限性食管癌患者的首选治疗方法。然而,尽管进行了根治性切除,5年生存率仍在15%至39%之间。手术无法治愈临床局限性食管癌的原因在于症状出现前疾病已处于晚期、淋巴结受累频率高以及黏膜下扩散和侵犯周围结构的情况常见。术前化疗一直被用于试图降低肿瘤活性、提高可切除性,并改善无病生存期和总生存期。许多研究探讨了术前化疗后再进行手术是否能提高治愈率,但个别报告并不令人鼓舞。术前化疗在可切除胸段食管癌治疗中的作用仍不明确。

目的

本综述的目的是确定术前化疗对可切除胸段食管癌患者总生存期和/或生活质量的作用。

检索策略

通过检索Cochrane对照试验注册库(2000年第2期)、MEDLINE(1966 - 2000年)、EMBASE(1988 - 2000年)和CancerLit(1993 - 2000年)来识别试验。检查了所有已识别研究、综述文章和标准教科书的参考文献。联系了Cochrane UGPD小组的成员和肿瘤学领域的专家,要求他们提供任何未发表的临床试验和相关未发表材料的详细信息。没有语言限制。检索在2000年6月进行了更新。查阅了美国国立癌症研究所和放射治疗肿瘤学组的临床试验注册库以获取正在进行的试验。

入选标准

研究类型 本综述纳入了将潜在可切除食管癌(任何组织学类型)患者随机分为术前化疗组或未化疗组的研究(已发表或未发表)。如果研究不是真正随机的(I期或II期试验)、更新试验的早期版本、使用了其他治疗方式(如放疗、热疗)或没有单独手术对照组,则排除该研究。参与者类型 参与者包括潜在可切除胸段食管癌(任何组织学类型)患者。涉及颈段食管癌患者的试验被排除。干预类型 比较术前化疗(食管切除术)与单纯手术切除(食管切除术)的试验。结局指标类型 主要结局是每年的死亡情况。发病率(并发症)和生活质量是次要结局。

数据收集与分析

通过提取随机分配到治疗组和对照组的患者总数以及每组的死亡人数来确定每年的总死亡率。所有分析均基于意向性治疗,即根据患者分配的治疗进行分析,无论他们是否接受了该治疗。将1、2、3、4和5年的死亡率作为具有临床相关性的终点。如果未给出指定时间间隔的生存人数,则根据已发表的生存曲线进行估计。将治疗组(术前化疗加手术)的死亡人数与对照组(单纯手术)的死亡人数进行比较。还记录了治疗方式以及患者的人口统计学和特征及副作用。符合纳入标准的试验由两名独立评审员使用Jadad方法进行评估。

主要结果

共确定了14项随机对照试验和1项关于食管癌术前化疗与单纯手术对比的荟萃分析可能符合综述条件。本综述基于7项随机试验和1653名患者。基于固定效应模型的Peto比值比在1年时显示术前化疗与单纯手术的死亡率无差异(OR = 1.03)。在2年时,术前化疗的死亡率显著降低20%(OR = 0.80;95%置信区间0.65至0.99),但结果并不稳健。在3、4和5年时,比值比倾向于支持术前化疗,但包含1的宽泛置信区间表明结果不确切。没有已发表的试验报告生活质量结局。化疗似乎增加了发病风险。

综述作者结论

本综述结果表明,没有充分证据推荐术前化疗用于治疗可手术切除的胸段食管癌。(摘要截断)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验