Barr R G, Rowe B H, Camargo C A
Channing Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 181 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;2003(1):CD002168. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002168.
International guidelines currently recommend the use of methyl-xanthines for exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) for patients who have incomplete responses to bronchodilators. However, available clinical trials are small and underpowered to evaluate the benefits and risks of methyl-xanthines in this acute setting.
To determine the benefit of methyl-xanthines compared to standard care for COPD exacerbations.
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were identified from the Cochrane Airways Review Group COPD Register which is a compilation of systematic searches of CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE and CENTRAL and hand searching of 20 respiratory journals. In addition, primary authors and content experts were contacted to identify eligible studies. Bibliographies from included studies, known reviews and texts were also searched.
Only RCTs were eligible for inclusion. Studies were included if patients presented with acute COPD exacerbations and were treated with either methyl-xanthines (oral or intravenous) or placebo (with or without standard care) early in the acute treatment. Studies also needed to report either pulmonary function or admission results. Two reviewers independently selected potentially relevant articles and selected articles for inclusion. Methodological quality was independently assessed by two reviewers.
Data were extracted independently by two reviewers if the authors were unable to verify the validity of information. Missing data were obtained from authors or calculated from other data presented in the paper. The data were analysed using the Cochrane Review Manager 4.0.4 Studies were pooled to yield weighted mean differences (WMD) or odds ratios (OR) and reported using 95% confidence intervals (95%CI).
From 28 identified references, 4 RCTs met inclusion criteria (172 patients). Mean change in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) at 2 hours was similar in methyl-xanthine and placebo groups (FEV1 WMD: -8 ml; 95% CI: -85 to 69 ml). The only study to report hospitalization rates showed a non-significant reduction with methyl-xanthines (OR: 0.3; 95% CI: 0.1 to 1.8) among 39 patients. Patients receiving methyl-xanthines had similar improvements in symptom scores, but reported more gastrointestinal side effects (OR: 5.3; 95% CI: 1.3 to 21.0) than patients receiving placebo.
REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence to support the routine use of methyl-xanthines for COPD exacerbations. Methyl-xanthines do not appreciably improve FEV1 during COPD exacerbations and cause adverse effects; evidence of their effect on admissions is limited.
国际指南目前建议,对于使用支气管扩张剂治疗效果不完全理想的慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)加重期患者,可使用甲基黄嘌呤类药物。然而,现有的临床试验规模较小,不足以评估甲基黄嘌呤类药物在这种急性情况下的益处和风险。
确定与COPD加重期的标准治疗相比,甲基黄嘌呤类药物的益处。
从Cochrane Airways Review Group COPD注册库中识别随机对照试验(RCT),该注册库是对CINAHL、EMBASE、MEDLINE和CENTRAL进行系统检索以及对20种呼吸期刊进行手工检索的汇编。此外,还联系了主要作者和内容专家以识别符合条件的研究。对纳入研究的参考文献、已知的综述和文献也进行了检索。
仅纳入RCT。如果患者出现急性COPD加重,并在急性治疗早期接受甲基黄嘌呤类药物(口服或静脉注射)或安慰剂(有或无标准治疗)治疗,则纳入研究。研究还需要报告肺功能或住院结果。两名评审员独立选择潜在相关文章并选择纳入文章。两名评审员独立评估方法学质量。
如果作者无法核实信息的有效性,则由两名评审员独立提取数据。缺失数据从作者处获取或根据论文中呈现的其他数据计算得出。使用Cochrane Review Manager 4.0.4对数据进行分析。将研究合并以得出加权平均差(WMD)或比值比(OR),并使用95%置信区间(95%CI)进行报告。
从28篇已识别的参考文献中,4项RCT符合纳入标准(172例患者)。甲基黄嘌呤类药物组和安慰剂组在2小时时一秒用力呼气量(FEV1)的平均变化相似(FEV1 WMD:-8 ml;95%CI:-85至69 ml)。唯一报告住院率的研究显示,在39例患者中,甲基黄嘌呤类药物组住院率有非显著降低(OR:0.3;95%CI:0.1至1.8)。接受甲基黄嘌呤类药物治疗的患者症状评分有相似改善,但与接受安慰剂治疗的患者相比,报告的胃肠道副作用更多(OR:5.3;95%CI:1.3至21.0)。
没有证据支持常规使用甲基黄嘌呤类药物治疗COPD加重期。甲基黄嘌呤类药物在COPD加重期并不能明显改善FEV1,且会引起不良反应;其对住院率影响的证据有限。