Roberts C L, Algert C S, Peat B, Henderson-Smart D
New South Wales Centre for Perinatal Health Services Research, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, and School of Population Health and Health Services Research, University of Sydney, Australia.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2001 Feb;41(1):15-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.2001.tb01288.x.
The aim of this study was to compare the management of term births among rural and urban women, including the effect of indigenous status and out-of-area-birth for rural women. Data were obtained from the NSW Midwives Data Collection (MDC), on 619,298 women who gave birth to a live, singleton infant at term (37-45 weeks gestation) from 1 January 1990 to 31 December 1997. Compared with urban non-indigenous women, rural women and indigenous women had lower rates of obstetric interventions both before birth (induction of labour, planned Caesarean section and epidural) and at the time of birth (Caesarean after labour, instrumental delivery and episiotomy). This was especially true for rural women giving birth in the their local area. The differing pregnancy risk profile of rural women did not explain the differences in intervention rates but differences were partly explained by higher rates of epidural anaesthesia in urban areas.
本研究的目的是比较农村和城市妇女足月分娩的管理情况,包括农村妇女的原住民身份和异地分娩的影响。数据来自新南威尔士州助产士数据收集(MDC),涉及1990年1月1日至1997年12月31日期间分娩出活产单胎婴儿的619298名妇女(孕期37 - 45周)。与城市非原住民妇女相比,农村妇女和原住民妇女在产前(引产、计划剖宫产和硬膜外麻醉)和分娩时(产钳分娩、器械助产和会阴切开术)的产科干预率较低。对于在当地分娩的农村妇女来说尤其如此。农村妇女不同的妊娠风险特征并不能解释干预率的差异,但部分差异可由城市地区较高的硬膜外麻醉率来解释。