• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗事故:是医疗服务提供者的风险还是消费者保护?

Malpractice: provider risk or consumer protection?

作者信息

Fanaeian N, Merwin E

机构信息

Health Evaluation Sciences Program, University of Virginia School of Medicine, VA, USA.

出版信息

Am J Med Qual. 2001 Mar-Apr;16(2):43-57. doi: 10.1177/106286060101600202.

DOI:10.1177/106286060101600202
PMID:11285654
Abstract

The National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB) began operation in September 1990 as a clearinghouse for adverse action, licensure, and malpractice information in an effort to protect consumers and promote quality in health care. This study analyzed 66,107 and 1291 records of payments made for 50,396 physicians and 1218 nurses, respectively, from 1994 through 1998, to describe characteristics, trends, and risk factors of malpractice payment for physicians and nurses. The median payments, more often settlements paid by insurance companies than judgments in courts of law, were higher for physicians than for nurses. Mean payments were higher for residents than for non-resident physicians; median payments for residents were slightly lower than other physicians when adjusted for number of providers included in the payment. On the state level, correlation analyses suggested a significant positive association between the nurse rate of malpractice payments that were made and median per capita income, number of physicians per 1000 residents, and number of attorneys per 1000 residents; analysis revealed a significant negative association between this rate and the percentage of residents residing in rural areas and the number of nurses per 1000 residents. Although findings suggested that payment trends remained stable, there was great regional variation in the risk of malpractice payment for both physicians and nurses. The physician risk ranged from a low of 0.73% per physician per year in Alabama to a high of 3.7% in Wyoming, and the nurse risk ranged from a low of 0% per nurse per year in Vermont to a high of 0.075% in the District of Columbia. If the quality of health care provided by physicians and nurses does not vary geographically in the United States, then such a great discrepancy seems to challenge the notion that the risk of malpractice litigation consistently promotes the quality of health care.

摘要

国家从业者数据银行(NPDB)于1990年9月开始运营,作为一个收集不良行为、执照和医疗事故信息的信息交换中心,旨在保护消费者并提高医疗保健质量。本研究分析了1994年至1998年期间分别针对50396名医生和1218名护士支付的66107笔和1291笔款项记录,以描述医生和护士医疗事故支付的特征、趋势和风险因素。支付的中位数(保险公司支付的和解款比法院判决更为常见)医生高于护士。住院医生的平均支付额高于非住院医生;考虑到支付中包含的提供者数量进行调整后,住院医生的支付中位数略低于其他医生。在州层面,相关性分析表明,护士医疗事故支付率与人均收入中位数、每1000名居民中的医生数量以及每1000名居民中的律师数量之间存在显著正相关;分析还显示,该比率与农村地区居民百分比以及每1000名居民中的护士数量之间存在显著负相关。尽管研究结果表明支付趋势保持稳定,但医生和护士医疗事故支付风险在地区上存在很大差异。医生的风险范围从阿拉巴马州每年每位医生0.73%的低水平到怀俄明州3.7%的高水平,护士的风险范围从佛蒙特州每年每位护士0%的低水平到哥伦比亚特区0.075%的高水平。如果美国医生和护士提供的医疗保健质量在地理上没有差异,那么如此大的差异似乎对医疗事故诉讼风险始终能提高医疗保健质量这一观念提出了挑战。

相似文献

1
Malpractice: provider risk or consumer protection?医疗事故:是医疗服务提供者的风险还是消费者保护?
Am J Med Qual. 2001 Mar-Apr;16(2):43-57. doi: 10.1177/106286060101600202.
2
Physician Assistant and Nurse Practitioner Malpractice Trends.医师助理和执业护士的医疗事故趋势。
Med Care Res Rev. 2017 Oct;74(5):613-624. doi: 10.1177/1077558716659022. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
3
An epidemiologic study of closed emergency department malpractice claims in a national database of physician malpractice insurers.一项在医师职业责任保险公司全国数据库中进行的封闭急诊室医疗事故索赔的流行病学研究。
Acad Emerg Med. 2010 May;17(5):553-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00729.x.
4
The growth of physician medical malpractice payments: evidence from the National Practitioner Data Bank.医生医疗事故赔偿的增长:来自国家从业者数据库的证据。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Jan-Jun;Suppl Web Exclusives:W5-240-W5-249. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.w5.240.
5
Paid malpractice claims for adverse events in inpatient and outpatient settings.支付的不良事件医疗事故索赔:住院和门诊环境。
JAMA. 2011 Jun 15;305(23):2427-31. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.813.
6
Malpractice data from the National Practitioner Data Bank.来自国家从业者数据库的医疗事故数据。
Nurse Pract. 1995 Mar;20(3):32-5.
7
Surgical never events in the United States.美国的外科手术“零容忍”事件。
Surgery. 2013 Apr;153(4):465-72. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2012.10.005. Epub 2012 Dec 17.
8
Constitutional rights versus malpractice insurance settlements.宪法权利与医疗事故保险理赔
Physician Exec. 1994 Aug;20(8):7-9.
9
Trends in US malpractice payments in dentistry compared to other health professions - dentistry payments increase, others fall.与其他医疗行业相比,美国牙科医疗事故赔付趋势——牙科赔付增加,其他行业赔付下降。
Br Dent J. 2017 Jan 13;222(1):36-40. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.34.
10
The National Practitioner Data Bank and anesthesia malpractice payments.国家从业者数据库与麻醉医疗事故赔偿
Anesth Analg. 2006 Sep;103(3):646-9. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000226218.55224.53.

引用本文的文献

1
The US Medical Liability System: evidence for legislative reform.美国医疗责任制度:立法改革的证据
Ann Fam Med. 2006 May-Jun;4(3):240-6. doi: 10.1370/afm.535.