• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用离散选择实验估计对健康的时间偏好。

Estimating time preferences for health using discrete choice experiments.

作者信息

van der Pol M, Cairns J

机构信息

Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, UK.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2001 May;52(9):1459-70. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00256-2.

DOI:10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00256-2
PMID:11286369
Abstract

This study is the first to use discrete choice experiments to elicit inter-temporal preferences for health. Inter-temporal preferences with respect to one's own future health are compared with inter-temporal preferences with respect to others' future health. Discrete choice experiments are used to measure the relative importance of the duration of ill-health and how far in the future the ill-health occurs. Data were collected by postal questionnaire in the UK. The median implied rates of discount range from 0.055 to 0.091 for own health, depending on the period of delay, and from 0.078 to 0.147 for others' health. The implied discount rate varies with respect to age, self-rated health, and version of the questionnaire. The implied discount rates are broadly comparable with other published estimates using closed-ended methods. One concern is the large percentage of respondents with dominant preferences. This issue needs to be explored before adopting the approach of discrete choice experiments to elicit inter-temporal preferences.

摘要

本研究首次运用离散选择实验来引出对健康的跨期偏好。将关于自身未来健康的跨期偏好与关于他人未来健康的跨期偏好进行比较。离散选择实验用于衡量健康不佳持续时间的相对重要性以及健康不佳在未来多远的时间发生。数据通过英国的邮政问卷调查收集。根据延迟期的不同,自身健康的隐含贴现率中位数在0.055至0.091之间,他人健康的隐含贴现率中位数在0.078至0.147之间。隐含贴现率因年龄、自评健康状况和问卷版本而异。隐含贴现率与其他使用封闭式方法发表的估计值大致可比。一个担忧是有主导偏好的受访者比例较大。在采用离散选择实验方法引出跨期偏好之前,需要探讨这个问题。

相似文献

1
Estimating time preferences for health using discrete choice experiments.使用离散选择实验估计对健康的时间偏好。
Soc Sci Med. 2001 May;52(9):1459-70. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00256-2.
2
Do people value their own future health differently from others' future health?人们对自己未来健康的重视程度与他人未来健康的重视程度是否不同?
Med Decis Making. 1999 Oct-Dec;19(4):466-72. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9901900414.
3
Repeated follow-up as a method for reducing non-trading behaviour in discrete choice experiments.重复随访作为减少离散选择实验中不交易行为的一种方法。
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Jun;58(11):2211-8. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.08.021.
4
Use of discrete choice experiments to elicit preferences.使用离散选择实验来引出偏好。
Qual Health Care. 2001 Sep;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i55-60. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100055...
5
Estimation of private and social time preferences for health in northern Tanzania.坦桑尼亚北部健康方面个人与社会时间偏好的估计。
Soc Sci Med. 2005 Oct;61(7):1597-607. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.03.013.
6
Symptom-based outcome measures for asthma: the use of discrete choice methods to assess patient preferences.
Health Policy. 2001 Sep;57(3):193-204. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(01)00128-2.
7
Patient preferences for depression treatment programs and willingness to pay for treatment.患者对抑郁症治疗方案的偏好及治疗支付意愿。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2007 Jun;10(2):73-85.
8
Does attribute framing in discrete choice experiments influence willingness to pay? Results from a discrete choice experiment in screening for colorectal cancer.属性框架在离散选择实验中是否会影响支付意愿?结直肠癌筛查中离散选择实验的结果。
Value Health. 2009 Mar-Apr;12(2):354-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00417.x. Epub 2008 Jul 24.
9
Do patients always prefer quicker treatment? : a discrete choice analysis of patients' stated preferences in the London Patient Choice Project.患者是否总是更倾向于更快的治疗?:伦敦患者选择项目中患者表述偏好的离散选择分析。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2004;3(4):183-94. doi: 10.2165/00148365-200403040-00002.
10
A pilot discrete choice experiment to explore preferences for EQ-5D-5L health states.一项探索 EQ-5D-5L 健康状态偏好的初步离散选择实验。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013 Jun;11(3):287-98. doi: 10.1007/s40258-013-0035-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Discounting money and health effects from communicable and noncommunicable diseases in Thailand.贴现泰国传染病和非传染病的货币和健康影响。
Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 27;13(1):3324. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30559-2.
2
Challenges for Economic Evaluation of Health Care Strategies to Contain Antimicrobial Resistance.控制抗菌药物耐药性的医疗保健策略的经济评估面临的挑战。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2019 Sep 27;8(4):166. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics8040166.
3
Association between time preference, present-bias and physical activity: implications for designing behavior change interventions.
时间偏好、当前偏差与身体活动之间的关系:对行为改变干预措施设计的启示。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Dec 19;18(1):1388. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6305-9.
4
Discounting in Economic Evaluations.经济性评价中的折扣
Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Jul;36(7):745-758. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0672-z.
5
Values for health states with different life durations.不同生命时长的健康状态值。
Eur J Health Econ. 2015 Dec;16(9):917-25. doi: 10.1007/s10198-014-0634-0. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
6
Does temporal discounting explain unhealthy behavior? A systematic review and reinforcement learning perspective.时间折扣能解释不健康行为吗?一项系统综述及强化学习视角
Front Behav Neurosci. 2014 Mar 12;8:76. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00076. eCollection 2014.
7
Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making: a user's guide.开展离散选择实验以辅助医疗保健决策:用户指南
Pharmacoeconomics. 2008;26(8):661-77. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200826080-00004.
8
The behavioral economics of will in recovery from addiction.成瘾康复中意志力的行为经济学
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007 Sep;90 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S100-11. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.09.004. Epub 2006 Oct 10.
9
The introduction of integrated out-of-hours arrangements in England: a discrete choice experiment of public preferences for alternative models of care.英格兰非工作时间综合安排的引入:公众对替代护理模式偏好的离散选择实验。
Health Expect. 2006 Mar;9(1):60-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00365.x.
10
The importance of drug adverse effects compared with seizure control for people with epilepsy: a discrete choice experiment.药物不良反应与癫痫患者癫痫控制的重要性比较:一项离散选择实验。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2005;23(11):1167-81. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200523110-00008.