Suppr超能文献

趋化因子具有形成固相梯度的多种能力。

Chemokines have diverse abilities to form solid phase gradients.

作者信息

Patel D D, Koopmann W, Imai T, Whichard L P, Yoshie O, Krangel M S

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA.

出版信息

Clin Immunol. 2001 Apr;99(1):43-52. doi: 10.1006/clim.2000.4997.

Abstract

Chemokines play critical roles in leukocyte recruitment into sites of inflammation such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA). While chemokines immobilized on endothelium (solid-phase), but not soluble chemokines, direct rolling leukocytes to firmly adhere to endothelium, soluble and solid-phase chemokine gradients may play important roles in leukocyte extravasation into the tissue. In this study, we have sought to determine (1) if chemokines can be immobilized on structures in the extravascular space, (2) the mechanisms by which chemokines may be immobilized, and (3) if different chemokines have similar potentials to form solid-phase gradients. While secreted alkaline phosphatase (SEAP)-tagged chemokines SLC (CCL21), TARC (CCL17), and RANTES (CCL5) bound to mast cells and the extracellular matrix (ECM) in RA synovium under physiologic salt conditions, MCP1 (CCL2), MIP1 alpha (CCL3), MIP1 beta (CCL4), and fractalkine (FKN, CX3CL1) fusion proteins did not detectably bind. Chemokine binding to ECM and mast cells in situ and to immobilized heparin was inhibited by high salt and glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) heparin, heparan sulfate, chondroitin sulfate, and dermatan sulfate, but not by dextran or hyaluronan, indicating that the chemokines bind to highly sulfated GAGs. Chemokine binding to synovial structures correlated strongly with avidity of chemokine binding to heparin (SLC > TARC > RANTES > MIP1 beta > MCP1 > MIP1 alpha > FKN). A RANTES mutant with decreased avidity for heparin was not able to bind to ECM or mast cells. Thus, these data indicate that chemokines can bind to ECM and mast cell granule constituents in situ via interactions with GAGs. Further, only a subset of chemokines were able to bind efficiently to structures in the extravascular space, indicating that chemokines may form different types of gradients based on their GAG binding ability and that chemotactic gradients in tissues may be quite complex.

摘要

趋化因子在白细胞募集到炎症部位(如类风湿性关节炎,RA)的过程中发挥着关键作用。虽然固定在内皮细胞上(固相)的趋化因子,而非可溶性趋化因子,可引导滚动的白细胞牢固黏附于内皮细胞,但可溶性和固相趋化因子梯度可能在白细胞渗出到组织中发挥重要作用。在本研究中,我们试图确定:(1)趋化因子是否能固定在血管外空间的结构上;(2)趋化因子可能被固定的机制;(3)不同趋化因子形成固相梯度的潜力是否相似。在生理盐条件下,分泌型碱性磷酸酶(SEAP)标记的趋化因子SLC(CCL21)、TARC(CCL17)和RANTES(CCL5)与RA滑膜中的肥大细胞和细胞外基质(ECM)结合,而MCP1(CCL2)、MIP1α(CCL3)、MIP1β(CCL4)和 fractalkine(FKN,CX3CL1)融合蛋白未检测到明显结合。高盐和糖胺聚糖(GAGs)肝素、硫酸乙酰肝素、硫酸软骨素和硫酸皮肤素可抑制趋化因子与原位ECM和肥大细胞以及固定化肝素的结合,但葡聚糖或透明质酸则无此作用,这表明趋化因子与高度硫酸化的GAGs结合。趋化因子与滑膜结构的结合与趋化因子与肝素的结合亲和力密切相关(SLC > TARC > RANTES > MIP1β > MCP1 > MIP1α > FKN)。一种与肝素结合亲和力降低的RANTES突变体无法与ECM或肥大细胞结合。因此,这些数据表明趋化因子可通过与GAGs的相互作用原位结合到ECM和肥大细胞颗粒成分上。此外,只有一部分趋化因子能够有效结合到血管外空间的结构上,这表明趋化因子可能根据其GAG结合能力形成不同类型的梯度,并且组织中的趋化梯度可能相当复杂。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验