Mitsiades N, Poulaki V, Mitsiades C, Tsokos M
National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
Cancer Res. 2001 Mar 15;61(6):2704-12.
In this study, we investigated the sensitivity of Ewing's sarcoma family tumors (ESFTs) of children and adolescents to the tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing Ligand (TRAIL). TRAIL binds to death receptors (DRs) DR4, DR5, DcR1, and DcR2. Either DR4 or DR5 can induce apoptosis, whereas DcR1 and DcR2 are considered inhibitory receptors. Nine of 10 ESFT cell lines, including several that were Fas resistant, underwent apoptosis with TRAIL through activation of caspase-10, capase-8 (FLICE), caspase-3, and caspase-9. In contrast to the Fas signaling pathway, caspase-10, but not caspase-8 or the Fas-associated death domain-containing molecule, was recruited to the TRAIL receptor-associated signaling complex. We found that 9 of 10 ESFT cell lines expressed both DR4 and DR5 by Western blotting, whereas the TRAIL-resistant line expressed only DR4. However, DR4 was absent from the cell surface in the resistant and two additional lines (three of five tested lines), suggesting that it may have been nonfunctional. On the contrary, DR5 was located on the cell surface in all four sensitive lines tested, being absent only from the cell surface of the resistant line that was also DR5-negative by Western blotting. In agreement with these findings, the resistance of the line was overcome by restoration of DR5 levels by transfection. Levels of DcR1 and DcR2 or levels of the FLICE-inhibitory protein (FLIP) did not correlate with TRAIL resistance, and protein synthesis inhibition did not sensitize the TRAIL-resistant line to TRAIL. Because these data suggested that sensitivity of ESFTs to TRAIL was mainly based on the presence of DR4/DR5, we investigated the presence of these receptors in 32 ESFT tissue sections by immunohistochemistry. We found that 23 of 32 tumor tissues (72%) expressed both receptors, 8 of 32 (25%) expressed one receptor only, and 1 was negative for both. Our finding of wide expression of DR4/DR5 in ESFT in vivo, in combination with their high sensitivity to TRAIL in vitro and the reported lack of toxicity of TRAIL in mice and monkeys, suggests that TRAIL may be a novel effective agent in the treatment of ESFTs.
在本研究中,我们调查了儿童和青少年尤因肉瘤家族肿瘤(ESFTs)对肿瘤坏死因子相关凋亡诱导配体(TRAIL)的敏感性。TRAIL与死亡受体(DRs)DR4、DR5、DcR1和DcR2结合。DR4或DR5均可诱导凋亡,而DcR1和DcR2被认为是抑制性受体。10个ESFT细胞系中的9个,包括几个对Fas耐药的细胞系,通过激活半胱天冬酶 - 10、半胱天冬酶 - 8(FLICE)、半胱天冬酶 - 3和半胱天冬酶 - 9,在TRAIL作用下发生凋亡。与Fas信号通路不同,半胱天冬酶 - 10而非半胱天冬酶 - 8或含Fas相关死亡结构域的分子被招募到TRAIL受体相关信号复合物中。我们通过蛋白质印迹法发现10个ESFT细胞系中的9个同时表达DR4和DR5,而对TRAIL耐药的细胞系仅表达DR4。然而,在耐药细胞系以及另外两个细胞系(测试的5个细胞系中的3个)中,细胞表面不存在DR4,这表明它可能无功能。相反,在所有4个测试的敏感细胞系中,DR5位于细胞表面,仅在通过蛋白质印迹法检测DR5也呈阴性的耐药细胞系的细胞表面未检测到。与这些发现一致,通过转染恢复DR5水平可克服该细胞系的耐药性。DcR1和DcR2的水平或FLICE抑制蛋白(FLIP)的水平与TRAIL耐药性无关,并且蛋白质合成抑制并未使对TRAIL耐药的细胞系对TRAIL敏感。由于这些数据表明ESFTs对TRAIL的敏感性主要基于DR4/DR5的存在,我们通过免疫组织化学研究了32个ESFT组织切片中这些受体的存在情况。我们发现32个肿瘤组织中的23个(72%)同时表达这两种受体,32个中的8个(25%)仅表达一种受体,1个两种受体均为阴性。我们在体内ESFT中发现DR4/DR5广泛表达,结合它们在体外对TRAIL的高敏感性以及报道的TRAIL在小鼠和猴子中无毒性,表明TRAIL可能是治疗ESFTs的一种新型有效药物。