Wass V, Van der Vleuten C, Shatzer J, Jones R
Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Guy's, King's and St Thomas' School of Medicine, Weston Education Centre, London, UK.
Lancet. 2001 Mar 24;357(9260):945-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04221-5.
Tests of clinical competence, which allow decisions to be made about medical qualification and fitness to practise, must be designed with respect to key issues including blueprinting, validity, reliability, and standard setting, as well as clarity about their formative or summative function. Multiple choice questions, essays, and oral examinations could be used to test factual recall and applied knowledge, but more sophisticated methods are needed to assess clincial performance, including directly observed long and short cases, objective structured clinical examinations, and the use of standardised patients. The goal of assessment in medical education remains the development of reliable measurements of student performance which, as well as having predictive value for subsequent clinical competence, also have a formative, educational role.
临床能力测试用于决定医学资格和执业适用性,其设计必须考虑关键问题,包括蓝图规划、效度、信度、标准设定,以及明确其形成性或总结性作用。多项选择题、论文和口试可用于测试事实性记忆和应用知识,但需要更复杂的方法来评估临床技能,包括直接观察长病例和短病例、客观结构化临床考试以及使用标准化病人。医学教育评估的目标仍然是开发对学生表现的可靠测量方法,这些方法不仅对后续临床能力具有预测价值,还具有形成性的教育作用。