Steff A M, Trop S, Maira M, Drouin J, Hugo P
Division of Research and Development, PROCREA BioSciences, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
J Immunol. 2001 Apr 15;166(8):5044-50. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.166.8.5044.
In early CD4(-)CD8(-) pro-thymocytes, signaling through the pre-TCR is crucial for survival and differentiation into CD4(+)CD8(+) cells. At this more mature stage, interactions between alphabetaTCR and self-Ag/MHC complexes in turn lead either to cell survival and differentiation (positive selection) or to cell death (negative selection). Intrinsic differences must therefore exist between pre-TCR signals in CD4(-)CD8(-) thymocytes and alphabetaTCR signals in CD4(+)CD8(+) cells, since only the latter can mediate a death signal. In this work, we directly compared the capability of pre-TCR and alphabetaTCR to induce apoptosis in a CD4(-)CD8(-) thymoma cell line following receptor cross-linking with mAbs. Cross-linking of alphabetaTCR triggered high levels of programmed cell death, mimicking the negative selection signal usually induced in CD4(+)CD8(+) thymocytes. In contrast, pre-TCR was very inefficient at inducing apoptosis upon cross-linking, despite similar levels of surface receptor expression. Importantly, inefficient apoptosis induction by the pre-TCR did not result from its weak association with TCRzeta chain, since TCRs containing alpha-pTalpha chimeric chains, binding weakly to TCRzeta, were still able to induce apoptosis. Although similar tyrosine phosphorylation and calcium influx were induced after either pre-TCR or alphabetaTCR cross-linking, the two pathways diverged at the level of Fas ligand induction. Among putative transcription factors involved in Fas ligand mRNA induction, Nur77 and NFAT transcriptional activities were readily induced after alphabetaTCR, but not pre-TCR, stimulation. Together, these results support the view that the structure of the pre-TCR and alphabetaTCR directly influences their apoptosis-inducing capabilities by activating distinct signaling pathways.
在早期CD4(-)CD8(-)前胸腺细胞中,通过前TCR的信号传导对于存活以及分化为CD4(+)CD8(+)细胞至关重要。在这个更成熟的阶段,αβTCR与自身抗原/MHC复合物之间的相互作用继而导致细胞存活和分化(阳性选择)或细胞死亡(阴性选择)。因此,CD4(-)CD8(-)胸腺细胞中的前TCR信号与CD4(+)CD8(+)细胞中的αβTCR信号之间必定存在内在差异,因为只有后者能够介导死亡信号。在这项研究中,我们直接比较了前TCR和αβTCR在与单克隆抗体进行受体交联后,诱导CD4(-)CD8(-)胸腺瘤细胞系凋亡的能力。αβTCR的交联引发了高水平的程序性细胞死亡,模拟了通常在CD4(+)CD8(+)胸腺细胞中诱导的阴性选择信号。相比之下,尽管表面受体表达水平相似,但前TCR在交联后诱导凋亡的效率非常低。重要的是,前TCR诱导凋亡效率低并非源于其与TCRζ链的弱结合,因为含有α-pTα嵌合链且与TCRζ结合较弱的TCR仍能够诱导凋亡。尽管前TCR或αβTCR交联后诱导了相似的酪氨酸磷酸化和钙内流,但这两条途径在Fas配体诱导水平上出现了分歧。在参与Fas配体mRNA诱导的假定转录因子中,αβTCR刺激后可轻易诱导Nur77和NFAT转录活性,但前TCR刺激后则不能。总之,这些结果支持这样一种观点,即前TCR和αβTCR的结构通过激活不同的信号通路直接影响它们诱导凋亡的能力。