Berends M J, Hollema H, Wu Y, van Der Sluis T, Mensink R G, ten Hoor K A, Sijmons R H, de Vries E G, Pras E, Mourits M J, Hofstra R M, Buys C H, Kleibeuker J H, van Der Zee A G
Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Int J Cancer. 2001 May 1;92(3):398-403. doi: 10.1002/ijc.1206.
The predictive value of MLH1 or MSH2 protein expression for the presence of truncating germline mutations was examined in benign and (pre)malignant endometrial samples from 3 patient groups: (I) 10 endometrial cancer patients from hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) families with (n = 6) or without (n = 4) a known germline mutation; (II) 15 women from HNPCC families with (n = 7) or without (n = 8) a known germline mutation, who underwent endometrial sampling for non-malignant reasons; (III) 38 endometrial cancer patients <50 years of age, without HNPCC family history. Immunostaining for MLH1 and MSH2 was performed on paraffin-embedded sections. In group III, tumor DNA was examined for microsatellite instability (MSI) and MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6 mutation analysis was carried out. In 6/6 MLH1/MSH2 mutation carriers with endometrial cancer (group I), concordance was found between protein loss in the tumor and the corresponding mutation. In 3 MLH1 mutation carriers, MLH1 protein loss was also observed in concurrent endometrial hyperplasia. In group II, no protein loss was detected in normal endometrial tissue samples; in 3/4 patients with endometrial hyperplasia, MLH1/MSH2 protein loss was observed. In group III, protein loss was detected in 12/38 patients (9 MLH1, 3 MSH2), while in 3/11 patients with concurrent endometrial hyperplasia protein loss was also observed in the hyperplasia. MSI analysis in group III revealed 26 MSI-low and 12 MSI-high tumors. Mutation analysis in 28/38 patients showed only 1 missense MSH6 and no MLH1 or MSH2 germline mutations. In group III, loss of MLH1/MSH2 protein expression was not related to the presence of MSI or MLH1/MSH2 germline mutations. In conclusion, MLH1 or MSH2 protein loss in HNPCC-related endometrial neoplasia is strongly related to corresponding germline mutations. This relation was not clearly present in young sporadic endometrial cancer patients. Immunohistochemical pre-screening of the MLH1 and MSH2 proteins in endometrial hyperplasia or cancer can thus be helpful in HNPCC families. Frequent loss of MLH1 or MSH2 protein in endometrial hyperplasia indicates that this loss is an early event in endometrial carcinogenesis.
在来自3个患者组的良性和(癌前)恶性子宫内膜样本中,检测了MLH1或MSH2蛋白表达对截短种系突变存在的预测价值:(I)10例来自遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌(HNPCC)家族的子宫内膜癌患者,其中6例有已知种系突变,4例无已知种系突变;(II)15例来自HNPCC家族的女性,其中7例有已知种系突变,8例无已知种系突变,她们因非恶性原因接受了子宫内膜取样;(III)38例年龄<50岁、无HNPCC家族史的子宫内膜癌患者。对石蜡包埋切片进行MLH1和MSH2免疫染色。在第III组中,检测肿瘤DNA的微卫星不稳定性(MSI),并进行MLH1、MSH2和MSH6突变分析。在6/6例患有子宫内膜癌的MLH1/MSH2突变携带者(第I组)中,发现肿瘤中的蛋白缺失与相应突变一致。在3例MLH1突变携带者中,在同时存在的子宫内膜增生中也观察到MLH1蛋白缺失。在第II组中,正常子宫内膜组织样本中未检测到蛋白缺失;在3/4例子宫内膜增生患者中,观察到MLH1/MSH2蛋白缺失。在第III组中,在12/38例患者(9例MLH1,3例MSH2)中检测到蛋白缺失,而在3/11例同时存在子宫内膜增生的患者中,增生组织中也观察到蛋白缺失。第III组的MSI分析显示26例MSI低和12例MSI高的肿瘤。28/38例患者的突变分析仅显示1例错义MSH6,未发现MLH1或MSH2种系突变。在第III组中,MLH1/MSH2蛋白表达缺失与MSI或MLH1/MSH2种系突变的存在无关。总之,HNPCC相关子宫内膜肿瘤中MLH1或MSH2蛋白缺失与相应种系突变密切相关。这种关系在年轻的散发性子宫内膜癌患者中并不明显。因此,对子宫内膜增生或癌中的MLH1和MSH2蛋白进行免疫组化预筛查对HNPCC家族可能有帮助。子宫内膜增生中MLH1或MSH2蛋白频繁缺失表明这种缺失是子宫内膜癌变的早期事件。