Starck P L, Sherwood G D, Adams-McNeill J, Thomas E J
University of Texas-Houston Health Science Center School of Nursing, 1100 Holcombe Blvd, Suite 5.500, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2001 Apr;27(4):191-9. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(01)27017-5.
There is strong evidence in the pain management literature that undertreatment of pain is pervasive despite several approaches, including use of national guidelines, to completely correct the problem. Although the concept of medical errors has primarily been concerned with adverse events, it is not unreasonable that mismanagement of pain could also be classified as a medical error.
Error types can be classified as errors in assessment and documentation, errors in treatment and management, and errors in patient education. Within each of these categories, errors may be skill-, rule-, and/or knowledge-based, as suggested by evidence of mismanagement in various aspects of the pain management process as found in the literature. An examination of the root causes of medical errors may be used to detect system failures. At least ten steps can be identified in the process of pain management in the acute care setting, starting with admission, and errors can potentially occur at any step. A redesigned system could help improve error rates by incorporating use of skills, rules, and knowledge for effective management.
A new approach to the unsolved problem of pain management in acute care settings is proposed; this approach uses the concept of mismanagement as a medical error.
疼痛管理文献中有强有力的证据表明,尽管采取了包括使用国家指南在内的多种方法来彻底纠正这一问题,但疼痛治疗不足的情况仍然普遍存在。虽然医疗差错的概念主要关注不良事件,但将疼痛管理不当归类为医疗差错也并非不合理。
差错类型可分为评估与记录差错、治疗与管理差错以及患者教育差错。正如文献中在疼痛管理过程各个方面发现的管理不善证据所表明的那样,在这些类别中的每一类中,差错可能是基于技能、规则和/或知识的。对医疗差错根本原因的检查可用于发现系统故障。在急性护理环境中,从入院开始,疼痛管理过程中至少可确定十个步骤,并且在任何一个步骤都可能发生差错。重新设计的系统可通过纳入有效管理所需的技能、规则和知识的运用来帮助提高差错率。
针对急性护理环境中尚未解决的疼痛管理问题,提出了一种新方法;该方法将管理不善的概念视为医疗差错。