Newby L K, Storrow A B, Gibler W B, Garvey J L, Tucker J F, Kaplan A L, Schreiber D H, Tuttle R H, McNulty S E, Ohman E M
Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA.
Circulation. 2001 Apr 10;103(14):1832-7. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.103.14.1832.
Earlier, rapid evaluation in chest pain units may make patient care more efficient. A multimarker strategy (MMS) testing for several markers of myocardial necrosis with different time-to-positivity profiles also may offer clinical advantages.
We prospectively compared bedside quantitative multimarker testing versus local laboratory results (LL) in 1005 patients in 6 chest pain units. Myoglobin, creatine kinase-MB, and troponin I were measured at 0, 3, 6, 9 to 12, and 16 to 24 hours after admission. Two MMS were defined: MMS-1 (all 3 markers) and MMS-2 (creatine kinase-MB and troponin I only). The primary assessment was to relate marker status with 30-day death or infarction. More patients were positive by 24 hours with MMS than with LL (MMS-1, 23.9%; MMS-2, 18.8%; LL, 8.8%; P=0.001, all comparisons), and they became positive sooner with MMS-1 (2.5 hours, P=0.023 versus LL) versus MMS-2 (2.8 hours, P=0.026 versus LL) or LL (3.4 hours). The relation between baseline MMS status and 30-day death or infarction was stronger (MMS-1: positive, 18.8% event rate versus negative, 3.0%, P=0.001; MMS-2: 21.9% versus 3.2%, P=0.001) than that for LL (13.6% versus 5.5%, P=0.038). MMS-1 discriminated 30-day death better (positive, 2.0% versus negative, 0.0%, P=0.007) than MMS-2 (positive, 1.8% versus negative, 0.2%; P=0.055) or LL (positive, 0.0% versus negative, 0.5%; P=1.000).
Rapid multimarker analysis identifies positive patients earlier and provides better risk stratification for mortality than a local laboratory-based, single-marker approach.
早期在胸痛单元进行快速评估可能会提高患者护理效率。采用针对具有不同阳性时间曲线的多种心肌坏死标志物的多标志物策略(MMS)也可能具有临床优势。
我们前瞻性地比较了6个胸痛单元中1005例患者的床旁定量多标志物检测结果与当地实验室结果(LL)。在入院后0、3、6、9至12以及16至24小时测量肌红蛋白、肌酸激酶同工酶MB和肌钙蛋白I。定义了两种MMS:MMS - 1(所有3种标志物)和MMS - 2(仅肌酸激酶同工酶MB和肌钙蛋白I)。主要评估是将标志物状态与30天死亡或梗死情况相关联。与LL相比,MMS在24小时时阳性患者更多(MMS - 1为23.9%;MMS - 2为18.8%;LL为8.8%;P = 0.001,所有比较),并且MMS - 1(2.5小时,与LL相比P = 0.023)比MMS - 2(2.8小时,与LL相比P = 0.026)或LL(3.4小时)使患者更早呈阳性。基线MMS状态与30天死亡或梗死之间的关联比LL更强(MMS - 1:阳性,事件发生率为18.8%,阴性为3.0%,P = 0.001;MMS - 2:21.9%对3.2%,P = 0.001)(LL为13.6%对5.5%,P = 0.038)。MMS - 1对30天死亡的鉴别能力优于MMS - 2(阳性为1.8%,阴性为0.2%;P = 0.055)或LL(阳性为0.0%,阴性为0.5%;P = 1.000)(阳性为2.0%,阴性为0.0%,P = 0.007)。
与基于当地实验室的单标志物方法相比,快速多标志物分析能更早识别阳性患者,并为死亡率提供更好的风险分层。