Sidawy A N, Sumpio B, Clowes A W, Rhodes R S
Department of Surgery, VA Medical Center, George Washington University and Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
J Vasc Surg. 2001 Apr;33(4):854-60. doi: 10.1067/mva.2001.112233.
Recognizing the importance of basic science teaching in surgical education, the leadership of the Association of Program Directors in Vascular Surgery (APDVS) appointed a panel to gather information and to present its findings at the 1999 annual fall meeting of the Apdvs. A questionnaire was distributed to the program directors present. In addition, information was gathered from the American Board of Surgery regarding the basic science content in the vascular surgery item pool on the vascular surgery qualifying examination (VQE). The vascular surgery unit of the surgical resident curriculum was also analyzed. Fifty-three program directors (64%) completed the questionnaire. Although only two program directors felt that their residents were better prepared to answer basic science questions, the results of the Vqe showed that the examinees do not, as a group, perform differently on basic science items than on clinical management questions. In addition, only a minority of program directors (15%) use a specific method to monitor the learning process of their residents. The majority of the program directors responding (75%) felt that they were capable of teaching basic science to residents. Interestingly, almost half the 53 respondents (47%) said that a basic science curriculum should be comprehensive, not exclusively relevant to the clinical setting. Vqe content outline and the vascular surgery unit of the surgical resident curriculum revealed great emphasis on clinically relevant basic science information. The Apdvs panel recommends that a basic science curriculum should be comprehensive, yet clinically pertinent, and completely integrated with the clinical curriculum. In terms of how to teach basic science in vascular residencies, the panel supports teaching conferences that are problem-based with a faculty member acting as the "resource person" and with specific goals set for the conferences. The panel also suggested establishing a Web site that provides a series of questions, the answers of which could be readily available to trainees and program directors. such immediate feedback could be of great help to program directors to focus the learning process of their residents and monitor its progress.
血管外科住院医师培训项目主任协会(APDVS)的领导层认识到基础科学教学在外科教育中的重要性,于是任命了一个小组来收集信息,并在1999年APDVS秋季年会上展示其调查结果。向与会的项目主任发放了一份调查问卷。此外,还从美国外科委员会收集了有关血管外科资格考试(VQE)中血管外科项目库基础科学内容的信息。同时也对外科住院医师课程中的血管外科单元进行了分析。53名项目主任(64%)完成了调查问卷。尽管只有两名项目主任认为他们的住院医师在回答基础科学问题方面准备得更好,但VQE的结果显示,作为一个群体,考生在基础科学项目上的表现与临床管理问题上的表现并无差异。此外,只有少数项目主任(15%)使用特定方法来监测其住院医师的学习过程。做出回应的大多数项目主任(75%)认为他们有能力向住院医师教授基础科学。有趣的是,53名受访者中近一半(47%)表示基础科学课程应该全面,而不仅仅局限于临床环境。VQE内容大纲和外科住院医师课程中的血管外科单元显示,非常强调与临床相关的基础科学信息。APDVS小组建议基础科学课程应该全面,但要与临床相关,并且要与临床课程完全整合。在如何在血管外科住院医师培训中教授基础科学方面,小组支持以问题为基础的教学会议,由一名教员担任“资源人员”,并为会议设定具体目标。小组还建议建立一个网站,提供一系列问题,学员和项目主任可以随时获取这些问题的答案。这种即时反馈对项目主任集中住院医师的学习过程并监测其进展会有很大帮助。