Logvinenko A D
School of Psychology, Queen's University, Belfast BT9 5BP, Northern Ireland, UK.
Perception. 2001;30(2):223-32. doi: 10.1068/p2846.
It has long been an accepted fact that a small test field presented against a large background may change its colour appearance because the test-field background contrast is attenuated by the receptor colour channels unequally (Willmer, 1944 Nature 153 774-775; Hartridge, 1947 Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B 232 519-671). Such an effect is usually called small-field tritanopia. However, as shown in the present report, a similar colour illusion can be achieved with a large test field as well, provided its spatial-frequency content is high enough to reveal the differential drop of contrast sensitivity for the receptor colour channels (high-spatial-frequency tritanopia). A few demonstrations are presented which show that a traditional explanation of high-spatial-frequency tritanopia (including small-field tritanopia), based on the hypothetical process of filling-in, is not correct. An alternative account, based on spatial filtering within the receptor colour channels, is put forward.
长期以来,人们一直公认这样一个事实:置于大背景中的小测试区域可能会改变其颜色外观,因为受体颜色通道对测试区域背景对比度的衰减是不均衡的(威尔默,1944年,《自然》153卷774 - 775页;哈特里奇,1947年,《伦敦皇家学会哲学学报》,B辑232卷519 - 671页)。这种效应通常被称为小视野蓝黄色盲。然而,如本报告所示,大测试区域也能产生类似的颜色错觉,前提是其空间频率内容足够高,足以揭示受体颜色通道对比度敏感度的差异下降(高空间频率蓝黄色盲)。本文给出了一些演示,表明基于假设的填充过程对高空间频率蓝黄色盲(包括小视野蓝黄色盲)的传统解释是不正确的。本文提出了一种基于受体颜色通道内空间滤波的替代解释。