Barnes B J, Moore P A, Pitha P M
Oncology Center and the Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21231, USA.
J Biol Chem. 2001 Jun 29;276(26):23382-90. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M101216200. Epub 2001 Apr 12.
Interferon regulatory factor (IRF) genes encode DNA-binding proteins that are involved in the innate immune response to infection. Two of these proteins, IRF-3 and IRF-7, serve as direct transducers of virus-mediated signaling and play critical roles in the induction of type I interferon genes. We have now shown that another factor, IRF-5, participates in the induction of interferon A (IFNA) and IFNB genes and can replace the requirement for IRF-7 in the induction of IFNA genes. We demonstrate that, despite the functional similarity, IRF-5 possesses unique characteristics and does not have a redundant role. Thus, 1) activation of IRF-5 by phosphorylation is virus-specific, and its in vivo association with the IFNA promoter can be detected only in cells infected with NDV, not Sendai virus, while both viruses activate IRF-3 and IRF-7, and 2) NDV infection of IRF-5-overexpressing cells preferentially induced the IFNA8 subtype, while IFNA1 was primarily induced in IRF-7 expressing cells. These data indicate that multiple signaling pathways induced by infection may be differentially recognized by members of the IRF family and modulate transcription of individual IFNA genes in a virus and cell type-specific manner.
干扰素调节因子(IRF)基因编码参与感染固有免疫反应的DNA结合蛋白。其中两种蛋白,即IRF-3和IRF-7,作为病毒介导信号传导的直接转导分子,在I型干扰素基因的诱导中发挥关键作用。我们现已表明,另一种因子IRF-5参与干扰素A(IFNA)和IFNB基因的诱导,并且在IFNA基因的诱导中可以替代对IRF-7的需求。我们证明,尽管功能相似,但IRF-5具有独特的特性且不具有冗余作用。因此,1)通过磷酸化激活IRF-5具有病毒特异性,并且其在体内与IFNA启动子的结合仅能在感染新城疫病毒(NDV)而非仙台病毒的细胞中检测到,而两种病毒均可激活IRF-3和IRF-7;2)过表达IRF-5的细胞感染NDV后优先诱导IFNA8亚型,而IFNA1主要在表达IRF-7的细胞中诱导产生。这些数据表明,感染诱导的多种信号通路可能被IRF家族成员以不同方式识别,并以病毒和细胞类型特异性的方式调节各个IFNA基因的转录。