Laparoscopy in patients with prior surgery: results of the blind approach.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To compare the complication rate due to blind access laparoscopy between patients with or without a prior history of laparotomy.

METHODS

We examined a prospective record of data on laparoscopic surgeries performed from 1992 to 1998. Only cases in which the Veress needle and the first trocar were inserted through the umbilicus were included in this study. Results issued from patients without previous abdominal surgery (Group I) were compared with those arising from women with prior laparotomy (Group II). A statistical analysis was performed using the Chi-square test or Fisher exact test when appropriate.

RESULTS

One thousand thirty-three laparoscopies were carried out during the study period, 881 of which began with a blind access through the umbilicus. Two hundred two women (19.3%) had an history of abdominal or pelvic surgery. Eight hundred forty-two patients were included in Group I and 39 in Group II. Failure to penetrate into the peritoneal cavity occurred significantly more frequently in Group II (4/39) than in Group I (1/842, P < 0.0001). The insertion of the Veress needle gave rise to 2 complications in Group I and 0 in Group II (P = 1.0). Transumbilical trocar insertion gave rise to 1 complication in each group (1/841 vs. 1/35, P = 0.11). When all events were considered, incidents or accidents were significantly more frequent in Group II (5/39) than in Group I (4/842)(P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

We recorded a higher rate of incidents/complications due to the Veress needle and trocar insertion in patients with a previous history of laparotomy. An adapted approach should be recommended for these patients.