Suppr超能文献

既往腹部手术对机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的影响。

Impact of previous abdominal surgery on robot-assisted radical cystectomy.

作者信息

Yuh Bertram E, Ciccone Joseph, Chandrasekhar Rameela, Butt Zubair M, Wilding Gregory E, Kim Hyung L, Mohler James L, Guru Khurshid A

机构信息

Department of Urology, State University of New York at Buffalo, USA.

出版信息

JSLS. 2009 Jul-Sep;13(3):398-405.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We analyzed the effect of previous abdominal surgery (PAS) on consecutive patients who underwent robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 2005 to 2008, 73 patients at a single institution underwent RARC with bilateral extended pelvic lymph node dissection and urinary diversion. Lysis of adhesions was performed robotically and laparoscopically. Records were reviewed to assess the impact of PAS on operative outcomes and complications up to 3 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Of the 73 patients, 37 (51%) had undergone PAS. Of these 37, 6 (16%) had PAS above the umbilicus, and 31 (84%) had surgery either above and below or strictly below the umbilicus. Patients with PAS were significantly older than those without (P<0.01). No statistically significant difference was seen with respect to blood loss, transfusion requirement, operative time, lysis of adhesion time, length of ICU stay, overall hospital stay, or the need for reoperation between patients with PAS and those without PAS. The overall postoperative complication rate was higher in the group with PAS (P=0.04). Lymph node yield was higher in patients without PAS (P<0.01). Patients with PAS below the umbilicus had a significantly longer hospital stay than patients with surgery strictly above the umbilicus had (P=0.01). Whether individuals had previously undergone single or multiple surgeries had no significance.

CONCLUSION

Robot-assisted radical cystectomy in patients with a history of previous surgery may carry a higher risk for postoperative complications. However, previous operations do not appear to affect the likelihood of a safely completed robotic operation. Patients should be counseled about their risk of obstacles after surgery.

摘要

目的

我们分析了既往腹部手术(PAS)对连续接受机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术(RARC)患者的影响。

材料与方法

2005年至2008年,一家机构的73例患者接受了RARC并进行双侧扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫及尿流改道。粘连松解通过机器人和腹腔镜进行。回顾记录以评估PAS对手术结果及术后3个月内并发症的影响。

结果

73例患者中,37例(51%)有PAS。在这37例中,6例(16%)的PAS在脐上,31例(84%)的手术在脐上和脐下或严格在脐下。有PAS的患者比没有PAS的患者年龄显著更大(P<0.01)。在失血、输血需求、手术时间、粘连松解时间、ICU住院时间、总住院时间或再次手术需求方面,有PAS和没有PAS的患者之间未观察到统计学显著差异。有PAS的组术后总体并发症发生率更高(P=0.04)。没有PAS的患者淋巴结获取量更高(P<0.01)。脐下有PAS的患者住院时间比严格在脐上进行手术的患者显著更长(P=0.01)。个人既往接受单次或多次手术并无意义。

结论

有既往手术史的患者行机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术可能术后并发症风险更高。然而,既往手术似乎并不影响安全完成机器人手术的可能性。应向患者告知其术后出现障碍的风险。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

3
Robotic colorectal surgery and ergonomics.机器人结直肠手术与工效学。
J Robot Surg. 2022 Apr;16(2):241-246. doi: 10.1007/s11701-021-01240-5. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
9
Robotics in uro-oncologic surgery.泌尿外科肿瘤手术中的机器人技术。
Ecancermedicalscience. 2013 Sep 26;7:354. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2013.354.

本文引用的文献

2
Robot-assisted extended pelvic lymphadenectomy.
J Endourol. 2008 Jun;22(6):1297-302. doi: 10.1089/end.2008.0075.
4
Contemporary open radical cystectomy: analysis of perioperative outcomes.当代开放性根治性膀胱切除术:围手术期结果分析
J Urol. 2008 Apr;179(4):1313-8; discussion 1318. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.11.084. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
7
The magnitude of adhesion-related problems.粘连相关问题的严重程度。
Colorectal Dis. 2007 Oct;9 Suppl 2:35-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01346.x.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验