Jardine S J, Gulabivala K
Eastman Dental Institute for Oral Health Care Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
Int Endod J. 2000 Jul;33(4):381-91. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2000.00327.x.
The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of root canal preparation using two automated rotary nickel-titanium instrumentation techniques with a double flared balanced forces hand preparation technique, using stainless steel files in extracted human teeth.
Sixty root canals in extracted human teeth were matched for curvature, length and diameter and divided evenly between three groups (group 1 = double flare using Flexofiles, group 2 = rotary nickel-titanium using McXIM instruments and group 3 = rotary nickel-titanium using Profile .04 Taper Series 29 instruments). The instruments were used according to the manufacturer's instructions in a torque controlled motor and handpiece (groups 2 and 3) and according to a predetermined procedure in group 1. A standardized radiographic technique using mercury as a contrast medium was used to evaluate the canal shape before and after preparation in the plane of maximum curvature. The pre- and postoperative radiographic images were compared against each other and with a predicted 'ideal preparation' calculated from a projection of the final instrument dimensions. The outcome measures were changes in canal dimensions as quantified by measuring the changes in the position of the inner and outer wall at 1 mm intervals. Alteration in canal curvature could be inferred by comparison with the ideal preparation.
The degree of canal curvature did not influence the effectiveness of any of the techniques. The results showed no statistically significant differences in the outcome measures between the groups (two-way ANOVA). There were no significant differences in canal wall position changes at any level except the apical three, where significantly less change occurred in all groups (P = 1%). Instruments fractured in three canals, with acute curves in groups 2 and 3.
Canal curvatures were equally and well maintained following preparation in all the groups, as long as the instrument did not fracture.
本研究旨在比较两种自动旋转镍钛器械预备技术与一种双喇叭口平衡力量手动预备技术(使用不锈钢锉对拔除的人牙进行根管预备)的疗效。
将拔除人牙中的60个根管根据弯曲度、长度和直径进行匹配,并平均分为三组(第1组 = 使用Flexofiles进行双喇叭口预备,第2组 = 使用McXIM器械进行旋转镍钛预备,第3组 = 使用Profile.04 Taper Series 29器械进行旋转镍钛预备)。器械按照制造商的说明在扭矩控制的电机和机头中使用(第2组和第3组),第1组按照预定程序使用。使用以汞作为对比介质的标准化放射技术,在最大弯曲平面评估预备前后的根管形态。将术前和术后的放射影像相互比较,并与根据最终器械尺寸投影计算出的预测“理想预备”进行比较。结果指标是通过每隔1毫米测量内壁和外壁位置的变化来量化的根管尺寸变化。通过与理想预备进行比较可以推断根管弯曲度的改变。
根管弯曲度不影响任何一种技术的有效性。结果显示,各组之间在结果指标上没有统计学上的显著差异(双向方差分析)。除根尖三分之一处外,各水平的根管壁位置变化均无显著差异,在根尖三分之一处,所有组的变化均显著较小(P = 1%)。在三个根管中器械发生折断,第2组和第3组中有弯曲较急的根管。
只要器械未折断,所有组在预备后根管弯曲度均能同样良好地保持。