Mahon J M, Norling B K, Phoenix R D
Department of Prosthodontics, University of Texas Health Science Center, School of Dentistry, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
Implant Dent. 2000;9(4):310-20. doi: 10.1097/00008505-200009040-00006.
The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the dissipation of a force applied to an assembled stack of implant components. The stack consisted of a 10-mm threaded implant, a screw-retained abutment and a screw-retained gold crown. The dissipation of force was analyzed in relation to varying the implant diameter with and without a concomitant change in abutment diameter. Two experimental groups were evaluated. The first group consisted of 25 titanium screw-form implants (Implant Innovations, Inc.). These implants measured 10 mm in length and 3.25 mm, 3.75 mm, 4.0 mm, 5.0 mm, and 6.0 mm in diameter. The second group included 15 titanium screw-form implants (Nobel Biocare, Inc.) measuring 10 mm in length and 3.75 mm, 4.0 mm, and 5.0 mm in diameter. All implants were embedded in standardized photoelastic resin blocks. Points of interest were marked on each block using standardized templates to ensure consistency. Implants were restored using system-specific conical abutments and standardized single-unit restorations. A strain gauge was affixed to each abutment, and an eccentric load of 176 N was applied to the restoration. Periimplant stresses were measured using photoelastic analysis. Abutment strain was determined using an electronic strain indicator. Data were collated and compared using ANOVA and the Duncan multiple range statistical tests. When stress was analyzed at points on the resin-implant interface or a fixed distance from the interface, stress tended to decrease from the 5-mm-wide implant to the 6-mm-wide implant. Stress in relation to the 3.25-mm, 3.75-mm, and 4.0-mm implant was not as well defined, indicating the possibility that some deformation of implants was occurring. Increased abutment width resulted in decreased abutment strain. Therefore, using a wider abutment may be helpful in preventing preload reduction in clinical applications. This may reduce the incidence of loosening and fracture of abutment and restoration screws.
本研究的目的是评估施加于一组组装好的种植体部件上的力的消散情况。该组件包括一个10毫米的螺纹种植体、一个螺丝固位基台和一个螺丝固位金冠。在改变种植体直径且基台直径随之改变或不改变的情况下,分析力的消散情况。评估了两个实验组。第一组由25枚钛质螺旋形种植体(种植体创新公司)组成。这些种植体长10毫米,直径分别为3.25毫米、3.75毫米、4.0毫米、5.0毫米和6.0毫米。第二组包括15枚钛质螺旋形种植体(诺贝尔生物保健公司),长10毫米,直径分别为3.75毫米、4.0毫米和5.0毫米。所有种植体均嵌入标准化的光弹性树脂块中。使用标准化模板在每个树脂块上标记出感兴趣的点,以确保一致性。使用特定系统的锥形基台和标准化的单单位修复体对种植体进行修复。在每个基台上粘贴一个应变片,并对修复体施加176 N的偏心载荷。使用光弹性分析测量种植体周围的应力。使用电子应变指示器确定基台应变。使用方差分析和邓肯多重极差统计检验对数据进行整理和比较。当在树脂-种植体界面处的点或距界面固定距离处分析应力时,应力倾向于从5毫米宽的种植体到6毫米宽的种植体逐渐减小。与3.25毫米、3.75毫米和4.0毫米种植体相关的应力不太明确,表明种植体可能发生了一些变形。基台宽度增加导致基台应变减小。因此,在临床应用中使用更宽的基台可能有助于防止预紧力降低。这可能会降低基台和修复螺丝松动及断裂的发生率。