Byrne Declan, Jacobs Stuart, O'Connell Brian, Houston Frank, Claffey Noel
School of Dental Science, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.
J Prosthodont. 2006 May-Jun;15(3):164-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2006.00096.x.
Abutment screw loosening, especially in the case of cemented single tooth restorations, is a cause of implant restoration failure. This study compared three screws (titanium alloy, gold alloy, and gold-coated) with similar geometry by recording the preload induced when torques of 10, 20, and 35 Ncm were used for fixation.
Two abutment types were used-prefabricated preparable abutments and cast-on abutments. A custom-designed rig was used to measure preload in the abutment-screw-implant assembly with a strain gauge. Ten screws of each type were sequentially tightened to 10, 20, and 35 Ncm on ten of the two abutment types. The same screws were then loosened and re-tightened. This procedure was repeated. Thus, each screw was tightened on three occasions to the three insertion torques. A linear regression model was used to analyze the effects on preload values of screw type and abutment type for each of the three insertion torques.
The results indicated that the gold-coated screw generated the highest preloads for all insertion torques and for each tightening episode. Further analysis focused on the effects of screw type and abutment type for each episode of tightening and for each fixation torque. The gold-coated screw, fixed to the prefabricated abutment, displayed higher preloads for the first tightening at 10, 20, and 35 Ncm. Conversely, the same screw fixed to the cast-on abutment showed higher values for the second and third tightening for all fixation torques. All screws showed decay in preload with the number of times tightened. Given the higher preloads generated using the gold-coated screw with both abutment types, it is more likely that this type of screw will maintain a secure joint when tightened for the second and third time.
All screw types displayed some decay in preload with repeated tightening, irrespective of abutment type and insertion torque. The gold-coated screw showed markedly higher preloads for all insertion torques and for all instances of tightening when compared with the uncoated screws.
基台螺丝松动,尤其是在粘结式单颗牙修复的情况下,是种植体修复失败的一个原因。本研究通过记录在使用10、20和35 Ncm扭矩进行固定时产生的预紧力,比较了三种几何形状相似的螺丝(钛合金、金合金和镀金螺丝)。
使用了两种基台类型——预制可预备基台和铸造基台。使用定制设计的装置,通过应变片测量基台螺丝-种植体组件中的预紧力。每种类型的十颗螺丝在两种基台类型中的十种上依次拧紧至10、20和35 Ncm。然后将相同的螺丝松开并重新拧紧。重复此过程。因此,每颗螺丝在三种插入扭矩下被拧紧三次。使用线性回归模型分析三种插入扭矩下螺丝类型和基台类型对预紧力值的影响。
结果表明,镀金螺丝在所有插入扭矩和每次拧紧过程中产生的预紧力最高。进一步分析聚焦于每次拧紧过程和每个固定扭矩下螺丝类型和基台类型的影响。固定在预制基台上的镀金螺丝在第一次拧紧至10、20和35 Ncm时显示出较高的预紧力。相反,固定在铸造基台上的同一颗螺丝在所有固定扭矩下的第二次和第三次拧紧时显示出较高的值。所有螺丝的预紧力都随着拧紧次数而衰减。鉴于两种基台类型使用镀金螺丝产生的预紧力更高,这种类型的螺丝在第二次和第三次拧紧时更有可能保持牢固的连接。
无论基台类型和插入扭矩如何,所有螺丝类型在重复拧紧时预紧力都会出现一定程度的衰减。与未涂层螺丝相比,镀金螺丝在所有插入扭矩和所有拧紧情况下都显示出明显更高的预紧力。