Björkstrand B, Svensson H, Goldschmidt H, Ljungman P, Apperley J, Mandelli F, Marcus R, Boogaerts M, Alegre A, Remes K, Cornelissen J J, Bladé J, Lenhoff S, Iriondo A, Carlson K, Volin L, Littlewood T, Goldstone A H, San Miguel J, Schattenberg A, Gahrton G
Dept of Medicine, Karolinska Institute and Huddinge Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden.
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2001 Mar;27(5):511-5. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1702826.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of alpha-IFN maintenance treatment after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for multiple myeloma in a retrospective registry analysis. 473 patients with multiple myeloma who received IFN maintenance treatment ASCT were compared with 419 patients who did not receive IFN-treatment. Patients who were evaluable for response and in complete or partial remission at 6 months after ASCT were eligible, after excluding patients with graft failure. Cox proportional hazards assumptions were checked and handled by stratification. The prognostic variables unevenly distributed between the two groups were statistically corrected for in the Cox analysis. 391 patients reached complete remission (CR) after ASCT (203 in the IFN group and 188 in the no-IFN group) and 501 were in partial remission (PR, IFN 270, no-IFN 231). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were significantly better in the IFN-group (OS, 78 vs 47 months, P = 0.007, and PFS, 29 vs 20 months, P = 0.006, respectively). The difference in OS and PFS was most strongly pronounced in the PR patients. 209 patients have died (IFN, 84; no-IFN, 125). Progressive myeloma was the cause of death in 94% of the IFN-treated patients and in 83% of the no-IFN group (P = NS). Thus, IFN maintenance treatment after ASCT was associated with better OS and PFS. Treatment seemed to be most beneficial in patients who did not achieve CR. The difference in median survival was as long as 2.5 years, and although part of this difference is attributable to differences in other prognostic factors, it might justify possible differences in quality-of-life due to adverse effects of interferon treatment.
本研究旨在通过一项回顾性登记分析,评估自体干细胞移植(ASCT)后α-干扰素维持治疗对多发性骨髓瘤的疗效。将473例接受干扰素维持治疗的ASCT多发性骨髓瘤患者与419例未接受干扰素治疗的患者进行比较。排除移植失败的患者后,对ASCT后6个月可评估缓解情况且处于完全或部分缓解的患者进行研究。通过分层检查和处理Cox比例风险假设。在Cox分析中,对两组间分布不均的预后变量进行了统计学校正。391例患者在ASCT后达到完全缓解(CR,干扰素组203例,非干扰素组188例),501例处于部分缓解(PR,干扰素组270例,非干扰素组231例)。干扰素组的总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)显著更好(OS分别为78个月和47个月,P = 0.007;PFS分别为29个月和20个月,P = 0.006)。OS和PFS的差异在PR患者中最为明显。209例患者死亡(干扰素组84例,非干扰素组125例)。进展性骨髓瘤是94%的干扰素治疗患者和83%的非干扰素组患者的死亡原因(P = 无显著性差异)。因此,ASCT后干扰素维持治疗与更好的OS和PFS相关。治疗似乎对未达到CR的患者最有益。中位生存期差异长达2.5年,尽管部分差异归因于其他预后因素的不同,但这可能证明干扰素治疗的不良反应导致生活质量存在差异是合理的。