MacArdle B M, West C, Bradley J, Worth S, Mackenzie J, Bellman S C
Cochlear Implant Programme, Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK.
Br J Audiol. 2001 Feb;35(1):17-29. doi: 10.1080/03005364.2001.11742728.
The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the use of the frequency transposition Transonic FT 40 system in a group of 36 children with profound sensorineural hearing loss. The group comprised 36 children (11 boys, 25 girls) aged between 2.8 and 15.6 years (mean 7.6 years) at fitting of the FT 40 device. At 48 months post-FT 40 fitting, only 11 children (30%) were still wearing the device. The children discontinued wearing the FT 40 for the following reasons: ergonomic (11%); no perceived benefit from the system (11%); cosmetic (17%); and subsequent cochlear implantation (30%). The performance of the long-term FT 40 users was investigated using the following outcome measures: aided soundfield hearing thresholds: closed set speech tests (the E2L toy test and the Manchester Picture Test discrimination test) and a speech intelligibility rating score. The 11 long-term FT 40 users (three boys, eight girls) were aged from 5.3 to 12.9 years (mean 7.2 years) at the time of initial fitting of the FT 40 device. At time of fitting, the aided soundfield thresholds with the FT 40 were significantly better at 500 Hz (p<0.04), 1 kHz (p<0.019), 2 kHz (p<0.001) and 4 kHz (p <0.001) compared to thresholds with conventional hearing aids. Six of 11 children did not show any change in performance on the closed set speech tests and two children had intelligible speech at 48 months' follow-up. A small subgroup of good performers was identified. These children were younger at age of fitting (mean 6.2 years compared to a mean of 7.7 years for the remainder of the group), were predominantly oral communicators and had identified aetiologies for their deafness. The present study suggests that there is a small subgroup of hearing-impaired children who benefit from frequency transposition hearing systems, and future suggested fitting criteria and outcome measures are listed.
这项回顾性研究的目的是调查频率转换式Transonic FT 40系统在一组36名重度感音神经性听力损失儿童中的使用情况。该组包括36名儿童(11名男孩,25名女孩),在安装FT 40设备时年龄在2.8至15.6岁之间(平均7.6岁)。在FT 40安装后48个月时,只有11名儿童(30%)仍在佩戴该设备。儿童停止佩戴FT 40的原因如下:人体工程学问题(11%);未感觉到该系统有任何益处(11%);外观问题(17%);以及随后进行了人工耳蜗植入(30%)。使用以下结果指标对长期使用FT 40的用户的表现进行了调查:助听听阈:闭集言语测试(E2L玩具测试和曼彻斯特图片测试辨别测试)以及言语可懂度评分。11名长期使用FT 40的用户(3名男孩,8名女孩)在最初安装FT 40设备时年龄在5.3至12.9岁之间(平均7.2岁)。在安装时,与传统助听器相比,FT 40的助听听阈在500 Hz(p<0.04)、1 kHz(p<0.019)、2 kHz(p<0.001)和4 kHz(p<0.001)时明显更好。11名儿童中有6名在闭集言语测试中的表现没有任何变化,2名儿童在48个月的随访时有可懂度言语。确定了一小部分表现良好的亚组。这些儿童在安装时年龄较小(平均6.2岁,而该组其余儿童平均为7.7岁),主要通过口语交流,并且已确定其耳聋的病因。本研究表明,有一小部分听力受损儿童从频率转换听力系统中受益,并列出了未来建议的适配标准和结果指标。