Mannion A F, Taimela S, Müntener M, Dvorak J
Schulthess Klinik Zürich, Switzerland.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Apr 15;26(8):897-908. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200104150-00013.
DESIGN: Randomized prospective study of the effects of three types of active therapy on back muscle function in chronic low back pain patients. OBJECTIVES: To quantify the effects of 3 months active therapy on strength, endurance, activation, and fatigability of the back entensor muscles. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Many studies have documented an association between chronic low back pain and diminished muscular performance capacity. Few studies have quantified the changes in these measures following interventions using objective measurement techniques or related them to changes in clinical outcome. METHODS: A total of 148 individuals (57% women) with chronic low back pain (age, 45.0 +/- 10.0 years; duration of low back pain, 10.9 +/- 9.5 years) were randomized to a treatment that they attended for 3 months: active physiotherapy, muscle reconditioning on devices, or low-impact aerobics. Before and after therapy, assessments were made of the following: trunk muscle strength (in flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation), erector spinae activation (maximal, and during forward bending movements), back extensor endurance (Biering-Sørensen test), and erector spinae fatigability (determined from changes in the median frequency of the surface electromyographic signal) during isometric and dynamic tests. RESULTS: A total of 132 of 148 patients (89%) completed the therapy. Isometric strength in each movement direction increased in all groups post-therapy (P < 0.0008), most notably in the devices group. Activation of the erector spinae during the extension tests also increased significantly in all groups and showed a weak, but significant, relationship with increased maximal strength (P = 0.01). Pretherapy 55% of the subjects showed no relaxation of the back muscles at L5 when in the fully flexed position; no changes were observed in any group post-therapy. Endurance time during the Biering-Sørensen test increased significantly post-therapy in all groups (P = 0.0001), but there were no significant changes in EMG-determined fatigability. Fatigability of the lumbar muscles at L5 (EMG median frequency changes) during the dynamic test increased post-therapy (P = 0.0001) without group differences. CONCLUSION: Significant changes in muscle performance were observed in all three active therapy groups post-therapy, which appeared to be mainly due to changes in neural activation of the lumbar muscles and psychological changes concerning, for example, motivation or pain tolerance.
设计:一项关于三种主动治疗方法对慢性下腰痛患者背部肌肉功能影响的随机前瞻性研究。 目的:量化3个月主动治疗对背部伸肌力量、耐力、激活和疲劳性的影响。 背景数据总结:许多研究记录了慢性下腰痛与肌肉功能能力下降之间的关联。很少有研究使用客观测量技术量化干预后这些指标的变化,或将其与临床结果的变化相关联。 方法:共有148例慢性下腰痛患者(57%为女性,年龄45.0±10.0岁,下腰痛持续时间10.9±9.5年)被随机分配至接受为期3个月的治疗:主动物理治疗、器械上的肌肉康复训练或低强度有氧运动。治疗前后,对以下各项进行评估:躯干肌肉力量(前屈、后伸、侧屈和轴向旋转)、竖脊肌激活(最大激活以及在向前弯曲运动期间)、背部伸肌耐力( Biering-Sørensen试验)以及等长和动态测试期间竖脊肌的疲劳性(由表面肌电图信号的中位频率变化确定)。 结果:148例患者中有132例(89%)完成了治疗。治疗后,所有组在每个运动方向上的等长力量均增加(P<0.0008),器械组最为明显。在伸展测试期间,所有组竖脊肌的激活也显著增加,并且与最大力量增加呈弱但显著的关系(P = 0.01)。治疗前,55%的受试者在完全屈曲位置时L5处的背部肌肉无放松;治疗后任何组均未观察到变化。Biering-Sørensen试验期间的耐力时间在所有组治疗后均显著增加(P = 0.0001),但肌电图测定的疲劳性无显著变化。动态测试期间L5处腰椎肌肉的疲劳性(肌电图中位频率变化)治疗后增加(P = 0.0001),无组间差异。 结论:治疗后,所有三个主动治疗组的肌肉功能均有显著变化,这似乎主要归因于腰椎肌肉神经激活的变化以及例如动机或疼痛耐受性等心理变化。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001-4-15
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998-3-1
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001-8-15
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025-2-19
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022-9-9
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-9-28
Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2021-2-26