• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左右束支传导阻滞的临床及随访研究

A clinical and follow-up study of right and left bundle branch block.

作者信息

Rotman M, Triebwasser J H

出版信息

Circulation. 1975 Mar;51(3):477-84. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.51.3.477.

DOI:10.1161/01.cir.51.3.477
PMID:1132086
Abstract

The experience with bundle branch block at the USAF School of Aerospace Medicine was reviewed. The clinical and follow-up status was evaluated in 394 subjects with right bundle branch block (RBBB) and 125 subjects with left bundle branch block (LBBB). The majority of subjects were asymptomatic at the time of bundle branch block diagnosis. The subjects were divided into subfroups based on electrocardiographic (EEG) findings to determine if any one subfroup was at higher risk for initial or follow-up morbidity of cardiobascular disease or follow-up mortality. At initial diagnosis and clinical evaluation, 94% of RBBB and 89% of LBBB subjects had no evidence of cardiobascular disease. In the RBBB group, 3 and 2% had cornary heart disease and hypertension, respectively; in LBBB subjects, 9 and 7% had cornary heart disease and hypertension, respectively. No one ECG subfroup in either the RBBB or LBBB group had a higher incidence of cardiobascular disease. Complete follow-up information was available in 94% of the RBBB subgroup subjects and 91% of the LBBB group. In the follow-up period, new cases of coronary heart disease and hypertension occurred in 6% of the RBBB group and 5 and 8%, respectively, in the LBBB group. Fourteen (4%) RBBB and nine (8%) LBBB subjects died during the follow-up period. No differences for follow-up groups. Progressive electrical dysfunction in the form of complete heart block occurred in one subject each absence, and degree of associated cardiobascular disease. Furthermore, within the age limits of the present aeromedical implications of bundle block are discussed.

摘要

回顾了美国空军航空航天医学院关于束支传导阻滞的经验。对394例右束支传导阻滞(RBBB)患者和125例左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)患者的临床及随访情况进行了评估。大多数患者在束支传导阻滞诊断时无症状。根据心电图(EEG)结果将患者分为亚组,以确定是否有任何一个亚组患心血管疾病初始或随访发病或随访死亡的风险更高。在初始诊断和临床评估时,94%的RBBB患者和89%的LBBB患者没有心血管疾病的证据。在RBBB组中,分别有3%和2%的患者患有冠心病和高血压;在LBBB患者中,分别有9%和7%的患者患有冠心病和高血压。RBBB组或LBBB组中没有一个心电图亚组的心血管疾病发病率更高。94%的RBBB亚组患者和91%的LBBB组患者有完整的随访信息。在随访期间,RBBB组中有6%的患者出现了冠心病和高血压新病例,LBBB组中分别为5%和8%。14例(4%)RBBB患者和9例(8%)LBBB患者在随访期间死亡。随访组之间无差异。完全性心脏传导阻滞形式的进行性电功能障碍在每组各有1例患者中出现,以及相关心血管疾病的程度。此外,还讨论了在当前航空医学适用年龄范围内束支传导阻滞的意义。

相似文献

1
A clinical and follow-up study of right and left bundle branch block.左右束支传导阻滞的临床及随访研究
Circulation. 1975 Mar;51(3):477-84. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.51.3.477.
2
Primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction with right bundle branch block: should new onset right bundle branch block be added to future guidelines as an indication for reperfusion therapy?急性心肌梗死合并右束支传导阻滞患者的直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:新发右束支传导阻滞是否应作为再灌注治疗的适应证加入未来的指南中?
Eur Heart J. 2012 Jan;33(1):86-95. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr291. Epub 2011 Sep 1.
3
The surface electrocardiogram predicts risk of heart block during right heart catheterization in patients with preexisting left bundle branch block: implications for the definition of complete left bundle branch block.体表心电图预测左束支阻滞患者行右心导管检查时发生心脏阻滞的风险:对完全性左束支阻滞定义的影响。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010 Jul;21(7):781-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2009.01714.x. Epub 2010 Feb 1.
4
Right bundle branch block in patients with suspected myocardial infarction.右束支传导阻滞患者疑似心肌梗死。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2019 Mar;8(2):161-166. doi: 10.1177/2048872618809700. Epub 2018 Oct 26.
5
Clinical characteristics and the severity of coronary atherosclerosis of different subtypes of bundle-branch block.不同类型束支传导阻滞的临床特征及冠状动脉粥样硬化严重程度。
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2022 Jan;27(1):e12883. doi: 10.1111/anec.12883. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
6
Left ventricular regional contraction abnormalities by echocardiographic speckle tracking in combined right bundle branch with left anterior fascicular block compared to left bundle branch block.与左束支传导阻滞相比,经超声心动图斑点追踪技术检测发现,合并右束支传导阻滞与左前分支传导阻滞时左心室局部收缩异常情况。
J Electrocardiol. 2016 May-Jun;49(3):353-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2016.02.002. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
7
Frequency and prognosis of new bundle branch block induced by surgical aortic valve replacement.外科主动脉瓣置换术所致新发束支传导阻滞的发生率及预后
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015 Feb;47(2):e47-53. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu435. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
8
Evaluation of mortality in bundle branch block patients from an electronic cohort: Clinical Outcomes in Digital Electrocardiography (CODE) study.从电子队列评估束支传导阻滞患者的死亡率:数字心电图学中的临床结果(CODE)研究。
J Electrocardiol. 2019 Nov-Dec;57S:S56-S60. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2019.09.004. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
9
Left anterior hemiblock in acute myocardial infarction. Incidence and clinical significance in relation to the presence of bundle branch block and to the absence of intraventricular conduction defects.急性心肌梗死中的左前分支阻滞。与束支阻滞的存在及无室内传导缺陷相关的发生率及临床意义。
Acta Med Scand. 1978;203(6):529-34.
10
Comparison of left ventricular torsion and strain with biventricular pacing in patients with underlying right bundle branch block versus those with left bundle branch block.潜在右束支传导阻滞患者与左束支传导阻滞患者双心室起搏时左心室扭转和应变的比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2015 Apr 1;115(7):918-23. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.01.018. Epub 2015 Jan 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence of Bundle Branch Block and Axis Deviation in Permanent Atrial Fibrillation and Gender Differences.永久性心房颤动中束支传导阻滞和电轴偏移的患病率及性别差异
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2025 Sep;30(5):e70110. doi: 10.1111/anec.70110.
2
Frequency of Electrocardiogram-Defined Cardiac Conduction Disorders in a Multi-Institutional Primary Care Cohort.多机构初级保健队列中心电图定义的心脏传导障碍的发生率
JACC Adv. 2024 May 24;3(7):101004. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101004. eCollection 2024 Jul.
3
Incidence of Coronary Artery Disease After Permanent Pacemaker Implantation: A Hospital-based Study from East India.
永久性起搏器植入术后冠状动脉疾病的发生率:一项来自印度东部的基于医院的研究。
J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2024 Jun 15;15(6):5911-5916. doi: 10.19102/icrm.2024.15065. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
Prevalence and Clinical Significance of Intraventricular Conduction Disturbances in Hospitalized Children.住院儿童室内传导障碍的患病率及临床意义
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024 Apr 22;11(4):129. doi: 10.3390/jcdd11040129.
5
Bundle branch block in cardiac arrest survivors without ischemic heart disease.无缺血性心脏病的心脏骤停幸存者中的束支传导阻滞
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2023 Feb 27;45:101188. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2023.101188. eCollection 2023 Apr.
6
Arrhythmias as Presentation of Genetic Cardiomyopathy.心律失常作为遗传性心肌病的表现。
Circ Res. 2022 May 27;130(11):1698-1722. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.122.319835. Epub 2022 May 26.
7
Major Left Bundle Branch Block and Coronary Heart Disease-Are There Any Differences between the Sexes?左束支传导阻滞与冠心病——两性之间存在差异吗?
J Clin Med. 2021 May 25;10(11):2284. doi: 10.3390/jcm10112284.
8
Clinical and Prognostic Significance of Idiopathic Left Bundle-Branch Block in Young Adults.年轻成人特发性左束支传导阻滞的临床及预后意义
Cardiol Res Pract. 2021 Mar 9;2021:6677806. doi: 10.1155/2021/6677806. eCollection 2021.
9
Natural history and clinical significance of isolated complete left bundle branch block without associated structural heart disease.孤立性完全性左束支传导阻滞的自然病史和临床意义,不伴有相关结构性心脏病。
Anatol J Cardiol. 2021 Mar;25(3):170-176. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2020.10008.
10
Relation of intraventricular conduction delay to risk of new-onset heart failure and structural heart disease in the general population.普通人群中室内传导延迟与新发心力衰竭及结构性心脏病风险的关系。
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2020 Sep 25;31:100639. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2020.100639. eCollection 2020 Dec.