Oates T W, Mumford J H, Carnes D L, Cochran D L
Department of Periodontics, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio 78229, USA.
J Periodontol. 2001 Mar;72(3):324-30. doi: 10.1902/jop.2001.72.3.324.
The therapeutic success of periodontal regenerative therapy may be compromised by our limited understanding of the wound healing process. Wound healing requires the coordination of complex cellular and molecular interactions. Recently, using an in vitro wound model, our laboratory has shown that gingival fibroblasts (GF) fill an in vitro wound more rapidly than periodontal ligament cells (PDL). This suggests that there may be differences in the levels of proliferation for these 2 cell types during the wound healing process. Such specific cell type differences may be significant in clinical outcomes of regenerative therapy. Therefore, the aim of this research was to characterize and compare the levels of both proliferation and cellular wound fill between GF and PDL using our in vitro wound model.
Primary cultures of human PDL and GF cells were established from explanted tissue, and passaged to 12-well tissue culture plates. Triplicate cultures of both cell types were grown to confluence and in vitro wounds were mechanically created, removing a 3 mm wide band of the cell layer across the diameter of the wells. The wells were then incubated for 2, 6, or 9 days in media containing either 0.1% or 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). At each time point, cells were pulsed with 5-bromo, 2-deoxyuridine (BrdU), fixed, and nuclei stained to measure DNA synthesis (as a measure for proliferation). Cells were counter stained with cytoplasmic stain to measure cell number. Quantitative analysis distant from (area of interest [AOI 1]), next to (AOI 2), and within the wound boundaries (AOI 3 and 4) was accomplished using computer-assisted histomorphometry.
The levels of proliferation and cellular fill for each cell type were assessed relative to time and AOI. Overall, the PDL displayed greater (P <0.01) levels of proliferation than the GF. For both cell types, proliferation was found to be significantly (P<0.001) greater at day 2 compared to other time points. PDL displayed greater levels of proliferation than GF in all AOI, with this difference reaching significance (P<0.02) within the cell layer (AOI 1 and 2). When comparing levels of cellular fill in 10% FBS, GF displayed greater wound fill than the PDL. This difference was significant at day 6 (P <0.05) for both the marginal (AOI 3) and central (AOI 4) portions of the wound.
These findings, demonstrating unique differences between PDL and GF with respect to proliferation and wound fill in an in vitro model, suggest that there may be cell-specific differences in cellular activity critical to periodontal wound healing. In addition, the results of this study show that the cellular proliferation response may not accurately reflect the overall wound healing response.
我们对伤口愈合过程的有限理解可能会影响牙周再生治疗的疗效。伤口愈合需要复杂的细胞和分子相互作用的协调。最近,我们实验室使用体外伤口模型表明,牙龈成纤维细胞(GF)比牙周膜细胞(PDL)更快地填充体外伤口。这表明在伤口愈合过程中这两种细胞类型的增殖水平可能存在差异。这种特定的细胞类型差异可能对再生治疗的临床结果具有重要意义。因此,本研究的目的是使用我们的体外伤口模型来表征和比较GF和PDL之间的增殖水平和细胞伤口填充情况。
从外植组织建立人PDL和GF细胞的原代培养物,并传代至12孔组织培养板。两种细胞类型的一式三份培养物生长至汇合,然后机械创建体外伤口,在孔的直径上移除3毫米宽的细胞层带。然后将孔在含有0.1%或10%胎牛血清(FBS)的培养基中孵育2、6或9天。在每个时间点,用5-溴-2-脱氧尿苷(BrdU)脉冲处理细胞,固定并对细胞核染色以测量DNA合成(作为增殖的指标)。用细胞质染料对细胞进行复染以测量细胞数量。使用计算机辅助组织形态计量学对远离(感兴趣区域[AOI 1])、旁边(AOI 2)以及伤口边界内(AOI 3和4)的区域进行定量分析。
相对于时间和AOI评估每种细胞类型的增殖水平和细胞填充情况。总体而言,PDL的增殖水平高于GF(P<0.01)。对于两种细胞类型,与其他时间点相比,第2天的增殖明显更高(P<0.001)。在所有AOI中,PDL的增殖水平均高于GF,在细胞层内(AOI 1和2)这种差异具有统计学意义(P<0.02)。当比较10% FBS中的细胞填充水平时,GF的伤口填充比PDL更多。在伤口的边缘(AOI 3)和中央(AOI 4)部分,这种差异在第6天具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。
这些发现在体外模型中证明了PDL和GF在增殖和伤口填充方面存在独特差异,表明在对牙周伤口愈合至关重要的细胞活性方面可能存在细胞特异性差异。此外,本研究结果表明细胞增殖反应可能无法准确反映整体伤口愈合反应。