Robaux M A, Dube L, Caillon J, Bugnon D, Kergueris M F, Navas D, Le Conte P, Baron D, Potel G
Laboratoire d'Antibiologie Clinique et Expérimentale, Faculté de Médecine, 1 rue Gaston-Veil, 44035 Nantes, France.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2001 May;47(5):617-22. doi: 10.1093/jac/47.5.617.
Ceftazidime and amikacin were administered in a Pseudomonas aeruginosa rabbit endocarditis model using computer-controlled intravenous (iv) infusion pumps to simulate human serum concentrations for the following regimens: continuous (constant rate) infusion of 4, 6 or 8 g of ceftazidime over 24 h or intermittent dosing of 2 g every 8 h either alone or in combination with amikacin (15 mg/kg once daily). The in vivo activities of these regimens were tested on four Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains. Animals were killed 24 h after the beginning of treatment. Efficacy was assessed by comparing the effects of the different groups on bacterial counts in vegetations for each strain tested. For a susceptible reference strain (ATCC 27853; MICs of ceftazidime and amikacin 1 and 2 mg/L, respectively), continuous infusion of 4 g alone or with amikacin was as effective as intermittent dosing with amikacin. For a clinical isolate producing an oxacillinase (MICs of ceftazidime and amikacin 8 and 32 mg/L, respectively), continuous infusion of 6 g was equivalent to intermittent dosing. For a clinical isolate producing a TEM-2 penicillinase (MIC of ceftazidime and amikacin 4 mg/L), continuous infusion of 6 g, but not intermittent dosing, had a significant in vivo effect. For a clinical isolate producing an inducible, chromosomally encoded cephalosporinase (MIC of ceftazidime and amikacin 8 and 4 mg/L, respectively), neither continuous infusion nor intermittent dosing proved effective. Determination of ceftazidime concentrations in vegetations showed that continuous infusion produced tissue concentrations at the infection site far greater than the MIC throughout the treatment. It is concluded that continuous infusion of the same total daily dose provides significant activity as compared with fractionated infusion. This study confirms that a concentration of 4-5 x MIC is a reasonable therapeutic target in most clinical settings of severe P. aeruginosa infection.
在铜绿假单胞菌兔心内膜炎模型中,使用计算机控制的静脉输液泵给予头孢他啶和阿米卡星,以模拟以下给药方案的人体血清浓度:24小时内持续(恒速)输注4、6或8克头孢他啶,或每8小时间歇给药2克,单独使用或与阿米卡星联合使用(每日一次,15毫克/千克)。在四种铜绿假单胞菌菌株上测试了这些给药方案的体内活性。治疗开始24小时后处死动物。通过比较不同组对每种测试菌株赘生物中细菌计数的影响来评估疗效。对于敏感参考菌株(ATCC 27853;头孢他啶和阿米卡星的MIC分别为1和2毫克/升),单独持续输注4克或与阿米卡星联合使用与与阿米卡星间歇给药效果相同。对于一株产生苯唑西林酶的临床分离株(头孢他啶和阿米卡星的MIC分别为8和32毫克/升),持续输注6克等同于间歇给药。对于一株产生TEM-2青霉素酶的临床分离株(头孢他啶和阿米卡星的MIC为4毫克/升),持续输注6克有显著的体内效果,但间歇给药无此效果。对于一株产生可诱导的染色体编码头孢菌素酶的临床分离株(头孢他啶和阿米卡星的MIC分别为8和4毫克/升),持续输注和间歇给药均无效。测定赘生物中头孢他啶浓度表明,在整个治疗过程中,持续输注在感染部位产生的组织浓度远高于MIC。得出的结论是,与分次输注相比,相同每日总剂量的持续输注具有显著活性。本研究证实,在大多数严重铜绿假单胞菌感染的临床情况下,4-5倍MIC的浓度是一个合理的治疗目标。