Suppr超能文献

超滤对血液透析患者外周尿素潴留的影响。

Effect of ultrafiltration on peripheral urea sequestration in haemodialysis patients.

作者信息

Schneditz D, Zaluska W T, Morris A T, Levin N W

机构信息

Renal Research Institute, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2001 May;16(5):994-8. doi: 10.1093/ndt/16.5.994.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ultrafiltration (UF) is assumed to enhance urea removal during haemodialysis (HD) because of convective transport and because of contraction of urea distribution volume. However, UF-induced blood volume reduction has been hypothesized to enhance peripheral urea sequestration and post-dialysis urea rebound (PDUR), possibly reducing HD effectiveness. The effect of UF on PDUR was investigated in this study.

METHODS

Nine HD patients were studied on two subsequent treatment days. The first HD was performed with UF (UF-rate=0.78+/-0.27 l/h), and the second treatment without UF. Serial measurements of serum water urea nitrogen concentration, arterial blood pressures (BP), and relative blood volume changes (BV%) were obtained over the duration of HD.

RESULTS

BP and BV% decreased with UF (BP(sys)= -9%, BP(dia)=-8%, BP(mean)=-9%, BV%=-15%) but increased or remained unchanged without UF (BP(sys)= 9%, BP(dia)=12%, BP(mean)=11%, BV%=1%). PDUR was 28.6+/-9.6% without UF, and increased in every single patient with UF (40.7+/-13.2%, P<0.01). Modelled perfusion of the peripheral low-flow compartment decreased from 1.45+/-0.54 l/min without UF to 0.91+/-42 l/min with UF (P<0.05), thereby explaining an enhanced two-compartment effect and increasing PDUR.

CONCLUSION

The significant increase in the two-compartment effect of urea kinetics observed in current HD accompanied by UF can be explained by compensatory, intradialytic blood flow redistribution induced by blood volume reduction. Because of the link between UF and blood flow, limited solute clearance treatment modes that optimize fluid removal such as variable UF will also have favourable effects on delivered dose of dialysis.

摘要

背景

由于对流运输以及尿素分布容积的收缩,超滤(UF)被认为可增强血液透析(HD)期间的尿素清除。然而,有假设认为超滤引起的血容量减少会增强外周尿素潴留和透析后尿素反弹(PDUR),可能会降低血液透析的有效性。本研究调查了超滤对透析后尿素反弹的影响。

方法

在连续两个治疗日对9名血液透析患者进行研究。第一次血液透析采用超滤(超滤率=0.78±0.27升/小时),第二次治疗不采用超滤。在血液透析过程中连续测量血清水尿素氮浓度、动脉血压(BP)和相对血容量变化(BV%)。

结果

采用超滤时血压和BV%下降(收缩压=-9%,舒张压=-8%,平均血压=-9%,BV%=-15%),而不采用超滤时血压升高或保持不变(收缩压=9%,舒张压=12%,平均血压=11%,BV%=1%)。不采用超滤时透析后尿素反弹为28.6±9.6%,采用超滤时每位患者均增加(40.7±13.2%,P<0.01)。外周低流量区的模拟灌注从不采用超滤时的1.45±0.54升/分钟降至采用超滤时的0.91±42升/分钟(P<0.05),从而解释了两室效应增强和透析后尿素反弹增加的现象。

结论

在当前伴有超滤的血液透析中观察到的尿素动力学两室效应显著增加,可以通过血容量减少引起的透析期间代偿性血流再分布来解释。由于超滤与血流之间的联系,优化液体清除的有限溶质清除治疗模式,如可变超滤,也将对透析的输送剂量产生有利影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验