Nakamura J, Csikszentmihalyi M
University of Chicago, USA.
Am Psychol. 2001 Apr;56(4):337-41.
This article illustrates how creativity is constituted by forces beyond the innovating individual, drawing examples from the career of the eminent chemist Linus Pauling. From a systems perspective, a scientific theory or other product is creative only if the innovation gains the acceptance of a field of experts and so transforms the culture. In addition to this crucial selective function vis-à-vis the completed work, the social field can play a catalytic role, fostering productive interactions between person and domain throughout a career. Pauling's case yields examples of how variously the social field contributes to creativity, shaping the individual's standards of judgment and providing opportunities, incentives, and critical evaluation. A formidable set of strengths suited Pauling for his scientific achievements, but examination of his career qualifies the notion of a lone genius whose brilliance carries the day.
本文以杰出化学家莱纳斯·鲍林的职业生涯为例,阐述了创造力是如何由创新个体之外的力量构成的。从系统的角度来看,只有当一项创新获得专家领域的认可并进而改变文化时,科学理论或其他产品才具有创造性。除了对已完成的工作具有这一关键的筛选功能外,社会领域还可以发挥催化作用,在整个职业生涯中促进个人与领域之间富有成效的互动。鲍林的例子展示了社会领域如何以多种方式促进创造力,塑造个人的判断标准,并提供机会、激励和批判性评价。鲍林具备一系列强大的优势,这使他取得了科学成就,但审视他的职业生涯会让那种仅凭个人才华就能成功的孤独天才的观念受到质疑。