• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Implantation of cardioverter defibrillators without induction of ventricular fibrillation.

作者信息

Swerdlow C D

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.

出版信息

Circulation. 2001 May 1;103(17):2159-64. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.103.17.2159.

DOI:10.1161/01.cir.103.17.2159
PMID:11331256
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The upper limit of vulnerability (ULV) is the weakest shock at which ventricular fibrillation (VF) is not induced by a T-wave shock. This study tested the hypothesis that a vulnerability safety margin based on the ULV can be used as an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation criterion.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators were implanted in 80 patients if T-wave shocks did not induce VF and the baseline-rhythm R wave was >/=7 mV. The T-wave shock was 10 J in the first 45 patients (group A) and 15 J in the last 35 patients (group B). After inductionless implantations, the first VF shock was programmed to the T-wave shock plus 5 J. If T-wave shocks induced VF, the ULV was measured and the first shock was programmed to the ULV+5 J. Inductionless implantations were performed in 58 patients (72%), 28 in group A (62%) and 30 in group B (86%; P=0.04). If T-wave scanning had been done at 15 J in group A patients, inductionless implantations could have been performed in 84% of them. At 3 months, VF was induced twice during electrophysiological study in 75 patients (94%). All VFs were detected in </=4.7 s and were terminated by the first shock. During follow-up, 197 of 198 appropriate first shocks for rapid ventricular tachycardia or VF (99%) were successful in patients who had inductionless implantations (95% confidence intervals, 97% to 100%).

CONCLUSION

Inductionless implantations can be performed in >80% of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator recipients using a vulnerability safety margin based on a T-wave scan at 15.

摘要

相似文献

1
Implantation of cardioverter defibrillators without induction of ventricular fibrillation.
Circulation. 2001 May 1;103(17):2159-64. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.103.17.2159.
2
Inductionless or limited shock testing is possible in most patients with implantable cardioverter- defibrillators/cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators: results of the multicenter ASSURE Study (Arrhythmia Single Shock Defibrillation Threshold Testing Versus Upper Limit of Vulnerability: Risk Reduction Evaluation With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantations).大多数植入式心脏复律除颤器/心脏再同步治疗除颤器患者可行无诱导或有限电击测试:多中心ASSURE研究(心律失常单次电击除颤阈值测试与易损性上限:植入式心脏复律除颤器植入的风险降低评估)结果
Circulation. 2007 May 8;115(18):2382-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.663112. Epub 2007 Apr 30.
3
Successful implantation of cardiac defibrillators without induction of ventricular fibrillation using upper limit of vulnerability testing.使用易损性上限测试成功植入心脏除颤器且未诱发心室颤动。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2003 Feb;8(1):71-5. doi: 10.1023/a:1022304417889.
4
Programming of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators on the basis of the upper limit of vulnerability.
Circulation. 1997 Mar 18;95(6):1497-504. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.95.6.1497.
5
Detection of the defibrillation threshold using the upper limit of vulnerability following defibrillator implantation.植入除颤器后利用易损性上限检测除颤阈值。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2005 Jun;28(6):498-505. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.50008.x.
6
Upper limit of vulnerability during defibrillator implantations predicts the occurrence of appropriate shock therapy for ventricular fibrillation.植入式除颤器治疗期间的易损性上限可预测室颤时恰当电击治疗的发生情况。
Circ J. 2014;78(7):1606-11. doi: 10.1253/circj.cj-14-0136. Epub 2014 May 9.
7
Automated vulnerability testing identifies patients with inadequate defibrillation safety margin.自动化漏洞测试可识别出除颤安全裕度不足的患者。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012 Dec;5(6):1073-80. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.112.971275. Epub 2012 Oct 10.
8
Upper limit of vulnerability is a good estimator of shock strength associated with 90% probability of successful defibrillation in humans with transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.易损性上限是经静脉植入式心脏复律除颤器的人类患者中与90%成功除颤概率相关的电击强度的良好估计指标。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996 Apr;27(5):1112-8. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00603-6.
9
Assessment of adequate safety margin using single coupling interval-upper limit of vulnerability test.使用单联律间期-易损性上限测试评估足够的安全边际。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2014 Jan;37(1):95-103. doi: 10.1111/pace.12251. Epub 2013 Aug 26.
10
Correlation of acute and chronic defibrillation threshold with upper limit of vulnerability determined in normal sinus rhythm.正常窦性心律下测定的急性和慢性除颤阈值与易损上限的相关性。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 1999 Jul;3(2):155-61. doi: 10.1023/a:1009825731592.

引用本文的文献

1
2015 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on optimal implantable cardioverter-defibrillator programming and testing.2015年心脏节律学会/欧洲心律协会/亚太心律协会/拉丁美洲心脏电生理和心脏起搏学会关于植入式心脏复律除颤器最佳程控与测试的专家共识声明
J Arrhythm. 2016 Feb;32(1):1-28. doi: 10.1016/j.joa.2015.12.001. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
2
ICD Shock, Not Ventricular Fibrillation, Causes Elevation of High Sensitive Troponin T after Defibrillation Threshold Testing--The Prospective, Randomized, Multicentre TropShock-Trial.除颤阈值测试后,ICD电击而非室颤导致高敏肌钙蛋白T升高——前瞻性、随机、多中心TropShock试验
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 24;10(7):e0131570. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131570. eCollection 2015.
3
Successful implantation of cardiac defibrillators without induction of ventricular fibrillation using upper limit of vulnerability testing.
使用易损性上限测试成功植入心脏除颤器且未诱发心室颤动。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2003 Feb;8(1):71-5. doi: 10.1023/a:1022304417889.