• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Programming of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators on the basis of the upper limit of vulnerability.

作者信息

Swerdlow C D, Peter C T, Kass R M, Gang E S, Mandel W J, Hwang C, Martin D J, Chen P S

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, Calif, USA.

出版信息

Circulation. 1997 Mar 18;95(6):1497-504. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.95.6.1497.

DOI:10.1161/01.cir.95.6.1497
PMID:9118518
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A patient-specific measure of defibrillation efficacy that requires a minimum number of ventricular fibrillation (VF) episodes would be valuable for programming implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). The upper limit of vulnerability (ULV) is the weakest shock strength at or above which VF is not induced when a stimulus is delivered during the vulnerable phase of the cardiac cycle. It correlates with the defibrillation threshold (DFT) and can be determined with a single episode of VF. The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that ICDs programmed on the basis of the ULV convert spontaneous ICD-detected VF reliably.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We studied 100 consecutive patients at ICD implantation and during follow-up of 20 +/- 7 months. At implantation, the ULV and DFT were determined, and the ICD system was tested at a shock strength equal to the ULV + 3 J. During follow-up, the strength of the first shock was programmed to the ULV + 5 J for arrhythmias detected in the VF zone (cycle length < 292 +/- 17 ms). We reviewed stored detection intervals and electrograms from spontaneous episodes of ICD-detected VF to determine the success rate for appropriate first shocks. The programmed first-shock strength was 17.5 +/- 5.2 J. During follow-up, there were 120 appropriate first shocks in 37 patients. The arrhythmia was rapid monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) in 70% of episodes (31 patients), VF in 11% (13 patients), polymorphic VT in 1%, and unclassified in 17% (15 patients). The first shock was successful in 119 of 120 episodes (99%; 95% CI, 93% to 100%). One unclassified episode required two shocks. No patient had syncope associated with an ICD shock or arrhythmic death.

CONCLUSIONS

ICD shocks can be programmed on the basis of the ULV, a measurement made in regular rhythm, without a direct measure of defibrillation efficacy.

摘要

相似文献

1
Programming of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators on the basis of the upper limit of vulnerability.
Circulation. 1997 Mar 18;95(6):1497-504. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.95.6.1497.
2
Successful implantation of cardiac defibrillators without induction of ventricular fibrillation using upper limit of vulnerability testing.使用易损性上限测试成功植入心脏除颤器且未诱发心室颤动。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2003 Feb;8(1):71-5. doi: 10.1023/a:1022304417889.
3
Correlation of acute and chronic defibrillation threshold with upper limit of vulnerability determined in normal sinus rhythm.正常窦性心律下测定的急性和慢性除颤阈值与易损上限的相关性。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 1999 Jul;3(2):155-61. doi: 10.1023/a:1009825731592.
4
Inductionless or limited shock testing is possible in most patients with implantable cardioverter- defibrillators/cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators: results of the multicenter ASSURE Study (Arrhythmia Single Shock Defibrillation Threshold Testing Versus Upper Limit of Vulnerability: Risk Reduction Evaluation With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantations).大多数植入式心脏复律除颤器/心脏再同步治疗除颤器患者可行无诱导或有限电击测试:多中心ASSURE研究(心律失常单次电击除颤阈值测试与易损性上限:植入式心脏复律除颤器植入的风险降低评估)结果
Circulation. 2007 May 8;115(18):2382-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.663112. Epub 2007 Apr 30.
5
Using the upper limit of vulnerability to assess defibrillation efficacy at implantation of ICDs.使用易损性上限评估植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)植入时的除颤效果。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2007 Feb;30(2):258-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2007.00659.x.
6
Strategic programming of detection and therapy parameters in implantable cardioverter-defibrillators reduces shocks in primary prevention patients: results from the PREPARE (Primary Prevention Parameters Evaluation) study.植入式心脏复律除颤器检测与治疗参数的策略性编程可减少一级预防患者的电击次数:PREPARE(一级预防参数评估)研究结果
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Aug 12;52(7):541-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.05.011.
7
Upper limit of vulnerability is a good estimator of shock strength associated with 90% probability of successful defibrillation in humans with transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.易损性上限是经静脉植入式心脏复律除颤器的人类患者中与90%成功除颤概率相关的电击强度的良好估计指标。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996 Apr;27(5):1112-8. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00603-6.
8
The zone of vulnerability to T wave shocks in humans.人类T波电击易损区。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1997 Feb;8(2):145-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.1997.tb00776.x.
9
Outcomes of defibrillator therapy in catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia.儿茶酚胺能多形性室性心动过速的除颤治疗结果
Heart Rhythm. 2014 Jan;11(1):58-66. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.10.027. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
10
Evaluation of a programming algorithm for the third tachycardia zone in a fourth-generation implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.对第四代植入式心脏复律除颤器中第三心动过速区编程算法的评估。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 1997 Feb;1(1):49-56. doi: 10.1023/a:1009766718942.

引用本文的文献

1
ICD Shock, Not Ventricular Fibrillation, Causes Elevation of High Sensitive Troponin T after Defibrillation Threshold Testing--The Prospective, Randomized, Multicentre TropShock-Trial.除颤阈值测试后,ICD电击而非室颤导致高敏肌钙蛋白T升高——前瞻性、随机、多中心TropShock试验
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 24;10(7):e0131570. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131570. eCollection 2015.