O'Dwyer P J, Manola J, Valone F H, Ryan L M, Hines J D, Wadler S, Haller D G, Arbuck S G, Weiner L M, Mayer R J, Benson A B
University of Pennsylvania Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
J Clin Oncol. 2001 May 1;19(9):2413-21. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.9.2413.
To investigate mechanism-directed regimens in maximizing the efficacy of fluorouracil (5-FU) in advanced colorected cancer.
Based on promising phase II data, a randomized comparison of various methods for the biochemical modulation of 5-FU was undertaken in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. The control group received single-agent 5-FU as a 24-hour infusion weekly. Patients (N = 1,120) with no prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease were randomized to one of the following arms: arm A, 5-FU 2,600 mg/m2 by 24-hour infusion, weekly; arm B, N-phosphonoacetyl-l-aspartic acid 250 mg/m2 day l, 5-FU 2,600 mg/m2 by 24-hour infusion day 2, weekly; arm C, 5-FU 600 mg/m2 with oral leucovorin (LV) 125 mg/m2 hourly for the preceding 4 hours, weekly; arm D, 5-FU 600 mg/m2 with intravenous (IV) LV 600 mg/m2, weekly; arm E, 5-FU 750 mg/m2/d IV by continuous infusion for 5 days, then 750 mg/m2 weekly, and recombinant interferon alfa-2a 9 million units subcutaneously three times weekly. Median follow-up was 4.8 years.
Of the 1,098 assessable patients, 57% had measurable disease. The toxicity of all the regimens was tolerable. Grade 4 or worse toxicity occurred in 11%, 11%, 30%, 24%, and 22% on each arm, respectively; diarrhea was the most common adverse effect. These toxicity patterns favored significantly (P <.001) the 24-hour infusion arms. Median survival (months) by arm was A, 14.8; B, 11.9; C, 13.5; D, 13.6; and E, 15.2. These survival durations did not differ significantly.
We conclude that a weekly infusion regimen of 5-FU is significantly less toxic than and as effective as 5-FU bolus regimens modulated by either LV or interferon in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
研究以机制为导向的方案,以最大限度提高氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)在晚期结直肠癌中的疗效。
基于有前景的II期数据,对晚期结直肠癌患者进行了5-FU生化调节的各种方法的随机对照研究。对照组接受单药5-FU,每周24小时静脉输注。未接受过转移性疾病化疗的患者(N = 1,120)被随机分为以下几组之一:A组,5-FU 2,600 mg/m²,每周24小时静脉输注;B组,第1天给予N-膦酰基乙酰-L-天冬氨酸250 mg/m²,第2天给予5-FU 2,600 mg/m²,每周24小时静脉输注;C组,5-FU 600 mg/m²,同时在之前4小时内每小时口服亚叶酸(LV)125 mg/m²,每周一次;D组,5-FU 600 mg/m²,同时静脉注射(IV)LV 600 mg/m²,每周一次;E组,5-FU 750 mg/m²/d静脉持续输注5天,然后每周750 mg/m²,同时重组干扰素α-2a 900万单位皮下注射,每周三次。中位随访时间为4.8年。
在1,098例可评估患者中,57%有可测量的疾病。所有方案的毒性均可耐受。每组4级或更严重毒性的发生率分别为11%、11%、30%、24%和22%;腹泻是最常见的不良反应。这些毒性模式显著有利于(P <.001)24小时输注组。各组的中位生存期(月)分别为:A组,14.8;B组,11.9;C组,13.5;D组,13.6;E组,15.2。这些生存时间无显著差异。
我们得出结论,对于转移性结直肠癌患者,5-FU每周输注方案的毒性明显低于LV或干扰素调节的5-FU推注方案,且疗效相当。