Nehler M R, Lawrence W A, Whitehill T A, Charette S D, Jones D N, Krupski W C
Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver 80262-0312, USA.
J Vasc Surg. 2001 May;33(5):943-7. doi: 10.1067/mva.2001.115002.
The purpose of this study was to examine the patterns of injury and the strategies of surgical repair of iatrogenic vascular injuries from a percutaneous vascular suturing device after arterial cannulation.
We retrospectively reviewed the clinical experience from an academic vascular surgical practice over a 2-year period. The subjects were patients undergoing vascular repair of iatrogenic vascular injury after deployment of a percutaneous vascular suturing device. Interventions were direct repair of arterial injury (with or without device extraction) or arterial thrombectomy and repair. The main outcome variables included patterns of arterial injury, magnitude of arterial repair, limb salvage, hospital stay, and perioperative mortality and morbidity rates.
From August 1998 through August 2000, eight patients (4 men, 4 women; median age, 55 years; range, 44-80 years) required vascular operations for complications of percutaneous suturing devices after diagnostic (2) or therapeutic (6) arteriograms through a transfemoral approach. Complications included four pseudoaneurysms (1 infected) due to arterial tear from suture pull through, two entrapped closure devices due to device malfunction, and two arterial thromboses due to narrowing/severe intimal dissection. All patients required operative intervention. Direct suture repair with or without device removal was performed in five patients, arterial debridement with vein patch angioplasty in one patient, and arterial thrombectomy and vein patch angioplasty in two patients. There were no perioperative deaths. The median hospital stay was 5 days (range, 2-33). Limbs were salvaged in all patients with a mean follow-up of 4.8 months (range, 1-13).
Although abbreviated postangiography recovery periods and early ambulation have motivated the widespread use of percutaneous suturing devices, the infrequent occurrence of vascular injuries produced by these devices can be significantly more challenging than simple acute pseudoaneurysms or hemorrhage. In addition, thrombotic complications have a small but finite risk of limb loss.
本研究旨在探讨经皮血管缝合装置在动脉插管后医源性血管损伤的损伤模式及手术修复策略。
我们回顾性分析了两年间一所学术性血管外科诊所的临床经验。研究对象为在使用经皮血管缝合装置后接受医源性血管损伤血管修复的患者。干预措施包括直接修复动脉损伤(有或无装置取出)或动脉血栓切除术及修复。主要结局变量包括动脉损伤模式、动脉修复程度、肢体挽救情况、住院时间以及围手术期死亡率和发病率。
从1998年8月至2000年8月,8例患者(4例男性,4例女性;中位年龄55岁;范围44 - 80岁)因经股动脉途径进行诊断性(2例)或治疗性(6例)血管造影后经皮缝合装置并发症而需要进行血管手术。并发症包括4例因缝线牵拉导致动脉撕裂形成的假性动脉瘤(1例感染)、2例因装置故障导致的卡压闭合装置以及2例因狭窄/严重内膜剥离导致的动脉血栓形成。所有患者均需手术干预。5例患者进行了有或无装置取出的直接缝合修复,1例患者进行了动脉清创加静脉补片血管成形术,2例患者进行了动脉血栓切除术加静脉补片血管成形术。围手术期无死亡病例。中位住院时间为5天(范围2 - 33天)。所有患者肢体均得以挽救,平均随访4.8个月(范围1 - 13个月)。
尽管血管造影后恢复期缩短和早期活动促使经皮缝合装置广泛应用,但这些装置导致的血管损伤发生率虽低,却比单纯急性假性动脉瘤或出血更具挑战性。此外,血栓形成并发症虽导致肢体丧失的风险较小但仍存在。