Divisón J, Puras A, Sanchis C, Artigao L, López Abril J, López De Coca E, Massó J, Rodríguez Paños B
Grupo de Estudio de Enfermedades Vasculares de Albacete (GEVA).
Aten Primaria. 2001 Mar 31;27(5):299-307. doi: 10.1016/s0212-6567(01)79371-7.
To compare accuracy and precision of self-measurement blood pressure (SMBP) at home, as a diagnosis method of hypertension, with mercury measurement in office and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM).
A comparison study of diagnosis methods.Setting.Hypertension Unit in the Hospital General de Albacete.
By means of a non-probabilistic sample, selected from consecutive cases that went to the unit, a 64 pharmacologically untreated hypertensive sample older than 18 has been selected.
All subjects were taken 3 measurements with mercury from a validated nurse in office, and were also taught to make 20 self-measurements of blood pressure in the morning at the office and 20 self-measurements in the evening at home with an automatic device Omron 705-CP, during the same day they were set a Takeda TM-2420 device programmed to measure their blood pressure for 24 hours. All proceedings were repeated 4 weeks later. Mean blood pressure values have been compared with every diagnosis method and sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value have been studied in every method reproducibility in every method has been analyzed.
Subjects were 29 men and 35 women with a mean of 53 years old. The mean values of office blood pressure (OBP) have been higher than SMBP and ABPM in the two periods of the study. SMBP has had a higher specificity and predictive value than OBP. Reproducibility of repeated SMBP in standardized conditions is similar to ABPM.
With a minimum program self-measurements at home, in standardized conditions, they can be considered as an accurate technique in the diagnosis of hypertension.
比较在家自行测量血压(SMBP)作为高血压诊断方法与诊室汞柱血压测量及动态血压监测(ABPM)的准确性和精确性。
诊断方法的比较研究。地点:阿尔巴塞特总医院高血压科。
通过从该科室连续就诊的病例中选取的非概率样本,选取了64例年龄大于18岁且未接受药物治疗的高血压患者。
所有受试者均由经验证的护士在诊室用汞柱血压计测量3次血压,同时还教会他们在诊室早晨自行测量20次血压,并于同日在家中晚上用欧姆龙705 - CP自动设备自行测量20次血压,为他们佩戴一台设定为24小时测量血压的武田TM - 2420设备。4周后重复所有操作。比较每种诊断方法的平均血压值,并研究每种方法的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值,分析每种方法的可重复性。
受试者中有29名男性和35名女性,平均年龄53岁。在研究的两个阶段,诊室血压(OBP)的平均值均高于SMBP和ABPM。SMBP的特异性和预测值高于OBP。在标准化条件下重复SMBP的可重复性与ABPM相似。
在标准化条件下,通过最少的家庭自行测量程序,可将其视为高血压诊断的一种准确技术。