Schofield C J, Maudlin I
ECLAT Network, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, WC1 E7HT, London, UK.
Int J Parasitol. 2001 May 1;31(5-6):614-9. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7519(01)00162-x.
In July 2000, Heads of State of the 36th Session of the Organisation for African Unity signed a potentially important declaration on African trypanosomiasis, urging member states "to act collectively to rise to the challenge of eliminating the problem through concerted efforts in mobilising the necessary human, financial and material resources required to render Africa tsetse-free within the shortest time possible". To many, such an ambitious dream is received with some scepticism, recalling the doubts that surrounded a similar declaration signed in Brasilia in 1991, which paved the way for the Southern Cone Initiative against American trypanosomiasis (Chagas disease). True, the two diseases are quite different. But the operational challenges are quite similar, and there are sufficient biological parallels to suggest that the Latin American experience in controlling Chagas disease may provide a useful model for the control of African trypanosomiasis.
2000年7月,非洲统一组织第36届会议的国家元首签署了一项关于非洲锥虫病的潜在重要宣言,敦促成员国“集体行动起来,迎接消除这一问题的挑战,通过协同努力调动所需的人力、财力和物力资源,以便在尽可能短的时间内使非洲无采采蝇”。对许多人来说,这样一个雄心勃勃的梦想受到了一些质疑,人们回忆起围绕1991年在巴西利亚签署的一份类似宣言的疑虑,该宣言为南锥体防治美洲锥虫病(恰加斯病)倡议铺平了道路。诚然,这两种疾病有很大不同。但业务挑战非常相似,而且在生物学上有足够的相似之处,这表明拉丁美洲控制恰加斯病的经验可能为控制非洲锥虫病提供一个有用的模式。