Calvert G T, Doolabh V B, Grand A G, Hunter D A, Mackinnon S E
Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2001 Apr;17(3):185-91. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-14350.
The rat model is commonly utilized in peripheral nerve research. Due to the short length of the rat limb and the animal's inherent neuroregenerative capacity, the timing of assessment of nerve regeneration is critical, and significant differences between groups can be lost if assessment is done too late. Additionally, the comparison of data from different rat-strain combinations has been questioned. This study better defines the time course of recovery after peripheral nerve grafting, and examines differences between Buffalo (BUF), Lewis (LEW), and ACI rats. Tibial-nerve isografts and allografts were performed and harvested at 6, 8, 10, or 14 weeks. Histomorphometry documented a statistically significant difference in the ACI/LEW and LEW/LEW combination at 10 weeks. No strain differences in graft rejection were noted. The optimal time to assess for histomorphometric differences in the ACI/LEW and LEW/LEW combination is at 10 weeks postoperatively.
大鼠模型常用于周围神经研究。由于大鼠肢体长度较短以及动物固有的神经再生能力,神经再生评估的时机至关重要,如果评估过晚,各组之间的显著差异可能会消失。此外,来自不同大鼠品系组合的数据比较也受到质疑。本研究更好地定义了周围神经移植后恢复的时间进程,并检查了布法罗(BUF)、刘易斯(LEW)和ACI大鼠之间的差异。进行了胫神经同种异体移植和异种移植,并在6、8、10或14周时进行取材。组织形态计量学显示,在10周时,ACI/LEW和LEW/LEW组合存在统计学上的显著差异。未观察到移植排斥反应的品系差异。评估ACI/LEW和LEW/LEW组合组织形态计量学差异的最佳时间是术后10周。