Kijak G H, Carobene M G, Salomón H
National Reference Center for AIDS, Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
J Virol Methods. 2001 May;94(1-2):87-95. doi: 10.1016/s0166-0934(01)00276-2.
The aim of this study was to compare the performance of two commercial drug-resistance HIV-1genotyping kits: LiPA (Innogenetics, Belgium) and TruGene (Visible Genetics, Canada). Samples from 103 HIV-1 infected individuals from Argentina were studied. The average correlation between the two methods was 92.81%. More codons could be analysed by TruGene than by LiPA (610/618 and 541/618 codons, respectively). The sequences of the samples and the LiPA probes were aligned showing that a silent mutation at codon 72 (AGA-->AGG) of the HIV-1 reverse transcriptase, which was not recognised by the LiPA probes, was present in 35/36 non-reactive samples for position 74. The overall prevalence of this polymorphism in the population studied was 39.81%. When sequences from different parts of the world were analysed 189/3395 (5.63%) carried the mutation at codon 72, while 23/133 (17.29%) of the sequences from Latin America (excluding Argentina) had this mutation. In both cases, the prevalence of this polymorphism in the Argentinean population was significantly higher. This highlights the importance of carrying out studies on the performance of genotyping kits outside the United States and Europe, especially in areas where non-B HIV-1 subtypes are prevalent.
本研究旨在比较两种商用HIV-1耐药基因分型试剂盒的性能:LiPA(比利时Innogenetics公司)和TruGene(加拿大Visible Genetics公司)。对来自阿根廷的103名HIV-1感染者的样本进行了研究。两种方法之间的平均相关性为92.81%。与LiPA相比,TruGene能够分析更多的密码子(分别为610/618和541/618个密码子)。样本序列与LiPA探针进行比对后发现,在针对第74位的35/36个非反应性样本中,存在HIV-1逆转录酶第72位密码子(AGA-->AGG)的沉默突变,而LiPA探针无法识别该突变。在所研究人群中,这种多态性的总体流行率为39.81%。当分析来自世界不同地区的序列时,189/3395(5.63%)携带第72位密码子的突变,而来自拉丁美洲(不包括阿根廷)的序列中有23/133(17.29%)存在该突变。在这两种情况下,这种多态性在阿根廷人群中的流行率均显著更高。这凸显了在美国和欧洲以外地区,尤其是在非B型HIV-1亚型流行的地区开展基因分型试剂盒性能研究的重要性。