vanOyen Witvliet C, Ludwig T E, Vander Laan K L
Psychology Department, Hope College, Holland, MI 49422-9000, USA.
Psychol Sci. 2001 Mar;12(2):117-23. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00320.
Interpersonal offenses frequently mar relationships. Theorists have argued that the responses victims adopt toward their offenders have ramifications not only for their cognition, but also for their emotion, physiology, and health. This study examined the immediate emotional and physiological effects that occurred when participants (35 females, 36 males) rehearsed hurtful memories and nursed grudges (i.e., were unforgiving) compared with when they cultivated empathic perspective taking and imagined granting forgiveness (i.e., were forgiving) toward real-life offenders. Unforgiving thoughts prompted more aversive emotion, and significantly higher corrugator (brow) electromyogram (EMG), skin conductance, heart rate, and blood pressure changes from baseline. The EMG, skin conductance, and heart rate effects persisted after imagery into the recovery periods. Forgiving thoughts prompted greater perceived control and comparatively lower physiological stress responses. The results dovetail with the psychophysiology literature and suggest possible mechanisms through which chronic unforgiving responses may erode health whereas forgiving responses may enhance it.
人际冒犯常常破坏人际关系。理论家们认为,受害者对冒犯者采取的反应不仅会对其认知产生影响,还会对其情绪、生理和健康产生影响。本研究考察了参与者(35名女性,36名男性)在重温伤害性记忆并心怀怨恨(即不宽恕)时,与培养同理心视角并想象给予宽恕(即宽恕)真实生活中的冒犯者时相比,所产生的即时情绪和生理影响。不宽恕的想法引发了更多厌恶情绪,与基线相比,皱眉肌(眉头)肌电图(EMG)、皮肤电导率、心率和血压变化显著更高。肌电图、皮肤电导率和心率的影响在想象结束后持续到恢复期。宽恕的想法带来了更强的控制感和相对较低的生理应激反应。这些结果与心理生理学文献相吻合,并提出了可能的机制,通过这些机制,长期不宽恕的反应可能损害健康,而宽恕的反应可能增进健康。