Suppr超能文献

抗肌内膜和转谷氨酰胺酶的IgA抗体:方法比较

IgA antibodies against endomysium and transglutaminase: a comparison of methods.

作者信息

Jaskowski T D, Schroder C, Martins T B, Litwin C M, Hill H R

机构信息

Associated Regional and University Pathologists (ARUP) Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Salt Lake City, Utah 84108, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Lab Anal. 2001;15(3):108-11. doi: 10.1002/jcla.1011.

Abstract

Recently, the endomysial antigen has been identified as the protein cross-linking enzyme known as tissue transglutaminase (tTG). Our objective was to compare a novel enzyme immunoassay (EIA) that detects IgA antibody against tTG to two standard IFA methods utilizing thin tissue sections of rat kidney/rat stomach (KS) and distal primate esophagus (PE) as substrates to detect IgA antibody against endomysium (EMA). Sera from 100 patients suspected of having gluten-sensitive enteropathy (GSE) and 23 sera possessing various antibodies used for EIA cross-reactivity studies were included. Additional tests, performed routinely in our laboratory, were utilized to further assess sera from patients suspected having GSE. These tests include anti-gliadin IgA antibody (AGA) and anti-reticulin IgA antibody (ARA) and are part of the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition (ESPGAN) revised criteria for diagnosing GSE. When compared to IFA using KS, the tTG EIA had a sensitivity of 87.5%, was 97.1% specific, and had an overall agreement of 94.0%. When compared to IFA using PE, the tTG EIA had a sensitivity of 92.6%, was 93.2% specific, and had an overall agreement of 93.0%. When the KS IFA was compared to the PE IFA for EMA, the KS IFA had a sensitivity of 96.3%, was 91.8% specific, and had an overall agreement of 93.0%. The majority of sera that were positive for tTG but were negative by IFA (KS, n = 2/PE, n = 5) possessed IgA antibodies against gliadin and/or reticulin. Five of six sera with negative results by PE IFA were positive by the KS IFA and possessed one or more antibodies to tTG and/or gliadin and/or reticulin. We conclude that the tTG EIA compares well to both KS and PE IFAs when detecting IgA antibody against endomysium. We do not recommend the use of PE to detect EMA primarily because of the inconsistencies (i.e., tissue selection, quality, and preparation) and limited availability of commercially prepared PE tissue.

摘要

最近,肌内膜抗原已被确定为一种名为组织转谷氨酰胺酶(tTG)的蛋白质交联酶。我们的目的是将一种检测抗tTG IgA抗体的新型酶免疫测定法(EIA)与两种标准免疫荧光法(IFA)进行比较,这两种免疫荧光法分别以大鼠肾脏/大鼠胃(KS)的薄组织切片和灵长类动物远端食管(PE)作为底物来检测抗肌内膜(EMA)IgA抗体。研究纳入了100例疑似患有麸质敏感性肠病(GSE)患者的血清以及23份具有各种用于EIA交叉反应性研究抗体的血清。我们实验室常规进行的其他检测被用于进一步评估疑似患有GSE患者的血清。这些检测包括抗麦醇溶蛋白IgA抗体(AGA)和抗网硬蛋白IgA抗体(ARA),它们是欧洲儿科胃肠病学和营养学会(ESPGAN)修订的GSE诊断标准的一部分。与使用KS的IFA相比,tTG EIA的敏感性为87.5%,特异性为97.1%,总体一致性为94.0%。与使用PE的IFA相比,tTG EIA的敏感性为92.6%,特异性为93.2%,总体一致性为93.0%。当将用于EMA检测的KS IFA与PE IFA进行比较时,KS IFA的敏感性为96.3%,特异性为91.8%,总体一致性为93.0%。大多数tTG检测呈阳性但IFA检测呈阴性的血清(KS组,n = 2;PE组,n = 5)含有抗麦醇溶蛋白和/或抗网硬蛋白IgA抗体。PE IFA检测结果为阴性的6份血清中有5份通过KS IFA检测呈阳性,并且含有一种或多种抗tTG和/或抗麦醇溶蛋白和/或抗网硬蛋白抗体。我们得出结论,在检测抗肌内膜IgA抗体时,tTG EIA与KS和PE IFA的检测效果相当。我们不建议主要使用PE来检测EMA,主要原因是存在不一致性(即组织选择、质量和制备)以及商业制备的PE组织供应有限。

相似文献

1
IgA antibodies against endomysium and transglutaminase: a comparison of methods.
J Clin Lab Anal. 2001;15(3):108-11. doi: 10.1002/jcla.1011.
3
Antibodies to gliadin, endomysium, and tissue transglutaminase for the diagnosis of celiac disease.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1999 Nov;29(5):571-4. doi: 10.1097/00005176-199911000-00018.
4
IgA anti-tissue transglutaminase as a diagnostic marker of gluten sensitive enteropathy.
J Clin Pathol. 1999 Apr;52(4):274-7. doi: 10.1136/jcp.52.4.274.
9
[Anti-endomysium, anti-reticulin and anti-gliadin antibodies, value in the diagnosis of celiac disease in the child].
Pathol Biol (Paris). 2001 Feb;49(1):47-52. doi: 10.1016/s0369-8114(00)00010-9.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Difficult treatment decisions in autoimmune hepatitis.
World J Gastroenterol. 2010 Feb 28;16(8):934-47. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i8.934.
2
A comparison of 13 guinea pig and human anti-tissue transglutaminase antibody ELISA kits.
J Clin Pathol. 2002 Jul;55(7):488-94. doi: 10.1136/jcp.55.7.488.
3
Commentary: advances in the laboratory diagnosis of celiac disease.
J Clin Lab Anal. 2001;15(3):105-7. doi: 10.1002/jcla.1010.

本文引用的文献

1
IgA anti-tissue transglutaminase as a diagnostic marker of gluten sensitive enteropathy.
J Clin Pathol. 1999 Apr;52(4):274-7. doi: 10.1136/jcp.52.4.274.
2
Antibodies to tissue transglutaminase as serologic markers in patients with dermatitis herpetiformis.
J Invest Dermatol. 1999 Jul;113(1):133-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.1999.00627.x.
3
Anti-transglutaminase antibodies and coeliac disease.
Aust N Z J Med. 1999 Apr;29(2):239-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.1999.tb00690.x.
4
IgA antibodies to tissue transglutaminase: An effective diagnostic test for celiac disease.
J Pediatr. 1999 Feb;134(2):166-71. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(99)70410-5.
5
Autoantibodies to tissue transglutaminase as predictors of celiac disease.
Gastroenterology. 1998 Dec;115(6):1317-21. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(98)70007-1.
6
Identification of tissue transglutaminase as the autoantigen of celiac disease.
Nat Med. 1997 Jul;3(7):797-801. doi: 10.1038/nm0797-797.
8
ACP Broadsheet No 149: September 1996. Serological diagnosis of gluten sensitive enteropathy.
J Clin Pathol. 1996 Sep;49(9):704-11. doi: 10.1136/jcp.49.9.704.
10
Serum IgA antiendomysium antibody titers as a marker of intestinal involvement and diet compliance in adult celiac sprue.
J Clin Gastroenterol. 1993 Sep;17(2):123-7. doi: 10.1097/00004836-199309000-00007.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验