Suppr超能文献

先发制人的生物防备:我们能从历史中学到什么吗?

Preemptive biopreparedness: can we learn anything from history?

作者信息

Fee E, Brown T M

机构信息

National Library of Medicine, History of Medicine Division, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20894, USA.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2001 May;91(5):721-6. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.5.721.

Abstract

The treat of bioterrorism is in the public eye again, and major public health agencies are urging preparedness efforts and special federal funding. In a sense, we have seen this all before. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention grew substantially during the Cold War era in large part because Alexander Langmuir, Chief Epidemiologist of the CDC, used an earlier generation's anxieties to revitalize the CDC, create an Epidemic Intelligence Service, and promote epidemiologic "surveillance" as part of the nation's defense. Retrospective investigation suggests that, while Langmuir contributed to efforts promoted by the Department of Defense and the Federal Civil Defense Administration, the United States did not have real cause to fear Communist biological warfare aggression. Given clear historical parallels, it is appropriate to ask, What was gained and what was lost by Langmuir's central role in that first instance of American biopreparedness? Among the conclusions drawn is that biopreparedness efforts fed the Cold War climate, narrowed the scope of public health activities, and failed to achieve sustained benefits for public health programs across the country.

摘要

生物恐怖主义的威胁再次引起公众关注,主要公共卫生机构正在敦促开展防范工作并争取联邦专项拨款。从某种意义上说,我们以前都见过这种情况。疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)在冷战时期大幅发展,这在很大程度上是因为CDC的首席流行病学家亚历山大·朗缪尔利用上一代人的焦虑情绪来振兴CDC,创建了疫情情报服务部门,并将流行病学“监测”作为国家防御的一部分加以推广。回顾性调查表明,虽然朗缪尔为国防部和联邦民防管理局推动的工作做出了贡献,但美国并没有真正理由担心共产主义的生物战攻击。鉴于明显的历史相似之处,有必要问一问,在第一次美国生物防范事件中,朗缪尔发挥核心作用,带来了什么,又失去了什么?得出的结论之一是,生物防范工作助长了冷战氛围,缩小了公共卫生活动的范围,并且未能为全国的公共卫生项目带来持续的益处。

相似文献

5
The first step toward building tools and methods for protection.迈向构建保护工具和方法的第一步。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999;894:118-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb08054.x.
6
Reducing the bioweapons threat: international collaboration efforts.减少生物武器威胁:国际合作努力
Public Health Rep. 2001;116 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):17-8. doi: 10.1093/phr/116.S2.17.
9
Opportunity knocks but twice for Public Health Preparedness Centers.公共卫生防范中心的机会只有两次。
Public Health Rep. 2010 Nov-Dec;125 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):1-3. doi: 10.1177/00333549101250S501.

引用本文的文献

2
Public health preparedness: a systems-level approach.公共卫生防范:一种系统层面的方法。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007 Apr;61(4):282-6. doi: 10.1136/jech.2004.030783.
4
Validation of syndromic surveillance for respiratory infections.呼吸道感染症状监测的验证
Ann Emerg Med. 2006 Mar;47(3):265.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.11.022. Epub 2006 Jan 18.
5
Biopreparedness and public health.生物防范与公共卫生。
Am J Public Health. 2001 Dec;91(12):1917-9. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.12.1917-a.

本文引用的文献

7
Bioterrorism: media hype or real potential nightmare?生物恐怖主义:媒体炒作还是真正潜在的噩梦?
Am J Infect Control. 1999 Dec;27(6):461-2. doi: 10.1016/s0196-6553(99)70019-2.
8
Bioterrorism initiatives: public health in reverse?生物恐怖主义举措:公共卫生的逆向发展?
Am J Public Health. 1999 Nov;89(11):1629-31. doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.11.1629.
10
Simulants, stimulants and diseases: the evolution of the United States biological warfare programme, 1945-60.
Med Confl Surviv. 1999 Jul-Sep;15(3):198-214. doi: 10.1080/13623699908409459.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验