Brown M D, Carter J, Watson T M, Thomas P, Santaguliana G, Purdie D M, Kay B H
Queensland Institute of Medical Research and University of Queensland Tropical Health Program, Royal Brisbane Hospital, Australia.
J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2001 Mar;17(1):8-12.
Laboratory bioassay studies were conducted in southeast Queensland, Australia, on the efficacy of Teknar, VectoBac 12AS, and Cybate (active ingredient: 1,200 international toxic units Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis [Bti]) against 3rd instars of the arbovirus vectors Aedes aegypti, Ae. notoscriptus, Ae. vigilax, and Ae. camptorhynchus. Probit analyses were then used to determine LD50 (median lethal dose), LD50, and lethal dose ratios (LDR). Aedes aegypti and Ae. notoscriptus, both container-habitat species, tolerated the highest Bti concentrations compared with saltmarsh Ae. vigilax and Ae. camptorhynchus. For example, the LDR for Ae. vigilax versus Ae. notoscriptus exposed to Cybate was 0.14 (95% confidence limit [CL] 0.03-0.61). Similarly, the Cybate LDR for Ae. camptorhynchus versus Ae. notoscriptus was 0.22 (95% CL 0.07-0.70). Teknar produced similar results with an LDR of 0.21 (95% CL 0.04-1.10) for Aedes vigilax versus Aedes notoscriptus. Differences in product efficacy were found when tested against the 2 container-breeding species. Cybate was less effective than Teknar with LDRs of 1.55 (95% CL 0.65-3.67) and 1.87 (95% CL 0.68-5.15) for Aedes aegypti and Ae. notoscriptus, respectively. The significant differences in susceptibility between mosquito species and varying efficacy between products highlight the importance of evaluating concentration-response data prior to contracting with distributors of mosquito control products. This information is crucial to resistance management strategies.
在澳大利亚昆士兰州东南部进行了实验室生物测定研究,以评估Teknar、VectoBac 12AS和Cybate(活性成分:1200国际毒性单位苏云金芽孢杆菌以色列变种[Bti])对虫媒病毒载体埃及伊蚊、新态伊蚊、刺扰伊蚊和弯翅伊蚊三龄幼虫的功效。然后使用概率分析来确定半数致死剂量(LD50)、致死中浓度(LC50)和致死剂量比(LDR)。埃及伊蚊和新态伊蚊这两种栖息于容器的物种,与盐沼中的刺扰伊蚊和弯翅伊蚊相比,能耐受最高浓度的Bti。例如,暴露于Cybate的刺扰伊蚊与新态伊蚊的LDR为0.14(95%置信区间[CL]0.03 - 0.61)。同样,弯翅伊蚊与新态伊蚊的Cybate LDR为0.22(95% CL 0.07 - 0.70)。Teknar产生了类似的结果,刺扰伊蚊与新态伊蚊的LDR为0.21(95% CL 0.04 - 1.10)。在针对两种栖息于容器繁殖的物种进行测试时,发现了产品功效的差异。对于埃及伊蚊和新态伊蚊,Cybate的效果不如Teknar,LDR分别为1.55(95% CL 0.65 - 3.67)和1.87(95% CL 0.68 - 5.15)。蚊虫物种之间易感性的显著差异以及产品之间功效的不同,凸显了在与蚊虫控制产品经销商签约之前评估浓度 - 反应数据的重要性。这些信息对于抗性管理策略至关重要。